New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank.
Review Published: Apr 19th, 2006
Spencer
76.0
"Not bad if you like pictures, but the non-exclusivity and video issues bring them down."
(+) Pictures look decent.
(+) Photo section is updated regularly.
(+) Site design looks nice.
(-) Mostly non-exclusive content.
(-) Video section could use some work.
(-) A bit expensive for what you get.
"Non-exclusive, well-known model content that doesn't pack enough of a punch for the price."
(+) Image content is good quality.
(+) Consistent updates.
(+) Full-length stream/downloads.
(+) Network access.
(-) Lack of navigational options.
(-) No model index.
(-) Video quality could be improved.
(-) No video updates for quite some time.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
