New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank.
Review Published: Jan 15th, 2006
Spencer
69.4
"Just too many problems and unknowns here to make it worth much of your time."
(+) Some content is up.
(+) It actually grew a little since last time.
(-) Hardly anything to see.
(-) Quality is bad all around.
(-) Not sure when updates come.
(-) No extras, interaction, etc.
"Mrs. Starr could use some tutoring of her own on how to run a successful amateur site with personality."
(+) Hardcore amateur content.
(+) lengthy video scenes.
(-) Site has absolutely no personality (diary, cam shows, etc).
(-) No content descriptions, viewing options, or date stamps.
(-) Content barely fits into the whole "teacher" theme.
(-) No date stamps or update schedule.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
