New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank.
Review Published: Aug 31st, 2008
Spencer
79.5
"I like the scenes and quality here, though the site really needs time to grow."
(+) Videos look great.
(+) Exclusive content.
(+) Network access included.
(-) Small site for now.
(-) Updates are less than weekly.
(-) Expensive.
(-) No interaction.
"The high quality videos are worth a look, but there's a lot to improve."
(+) Exclusive content.
(+) High quality videos.
(+) Network access.
(-) Too expensive.
(-) Small collection.
(-) Erratic updates.
(-) No interaction with Melanie.
"This blonde's content revolves around a small collection of high quality video episodes."
(+) Solo, boy/girl, & girl/girl shoots.
(+) High vid quality, full-scene files.
(+) Network access, other model sites.
(-) Small collection, updates vary.
(-) No vid file specs or length info.
(-) Sketchy blog entries/interaction.
"Small Network site with good quality content, but that's about it."
(+) Network access.
(+) Quality looks good.
(+) Hardcore content.
(-) Content is double posted in other Network sites.
(-) Plain design/lacks personality and content info.
(-) No updates for quite some time.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
