Some quality issues.

As I mentioned above, quality is all over the place. I certainly compliment their sharper scenes, but I have to criticize a few things. There are some small pictures here, as small as 265x400! Some of the photos are just collages of vidcaps. Older videos can also look grainy.

  No video options.

All of the scenes play in Windows Media at right around 1700k. There are no other formats, quality choices, or streaming options. There are no options for viewing the photos either.

  Design and navigation need work.

The Advanced Search is a great tool but the rest of the navigation isn't so great. While searching is fine, there aren't any good ways to browse. The design is quite plain with the only real graphics to speak of being banner ads for other sites. It's really a boring-looking design that can feel cluttered at times.

Minor Negatives:

• Updates aren't dated. They advertise updates every four days but with no dates, it's hard to say for sure.
• Many scenes/celebs have no nudity. There are a lot of ladies with just "sexy" or "glamour" shoots. The collection is hot, but I might even say the majority of the models don't get naked.
• Some mislabeled scenes. This one is hilarious. Amanda Bynes has a photo categorized as "Topless". Click on it for a screencap of her in a somewhat low-cut top. Below that is a member comment that goes off on the site, telling them to learn what topless and much worse. This isn't an isolated problem but the member comment made this incident stand out to me.
• Some celebs missing. I was surprised at some of the names I didn't find here, like current fave of mine Hayden Panettiere.