Some photosets shared between this site and Twistys.
Clone Notice
Although it's presented differently, MOST of the content in the members area for this site is the same as Twistys (91.0). If a review is done, we'll most likely only evaluate the source site. This site will still be listed in our directory.
Disclaimer: TBP does make a commission from sales to this web-site. It's also how we keep our site 100% banner free. This does not affect the integrity of the review. If you found our site or this review helpful, we hope you'll support TBP by visiting this site from our link above. Thank you.
Blue Fantasies is a Glamour Model/Photography site featuring some of the most gorgeous women online. You'll notice a few regulars like Aria Giovanni and Anita Dark, but there may some new names for you in there as well. Currently there are more than 450 models in 780 total photo sets and 437 videos. Since Blue Fantasies is a part of the Twistys Network, your $24.95 monthly membership here also gives access to another handful of sites including the famed Twistys itself. Overall I think you'll find navigation a breeze with many advanced features while still maintaining a simple design set-up. This is definitely a membership not to be passed up if you enjoy softcore/lesbian variety Glamour model content and like the idea of Twistys Network access.
The Pros
Large Collection of Original Content.
Original glamour content featuring hundreds of the webs most stunning models in beautiful photography and videos. Sensual spreads, lots of nude poses and some girl-girl action is what makes up the bulk of content on this site. Blue Fantasies features completely original content of some big name models along with plenty of fresh faces.
Bonus Site Access.
Your membership here also gives access to another 6 great sites featuring themes like Euro babes, Twistys, amateurs, some fetishes and more.
Advanced Site Design & Browse Features.
The content here listed in your most basic, easy to browse way with photos and videos listed separately in chronological order. There is also a model index and an updates list, but beyond all that are all the advanced search/filtering options made available on each page. The "power search" allows users to browse content by category, niche, clothing, toys, location, etc. and models by age, eye color, and my favorite (also most important) cup size, as well as ethnicity, location, and more.
Other Good Stuff:
Some good download options. Videos offer a full-length file as well as shorter clips in WMV, MOV and MP4 format for shorter clips as well as the full-length file. Zip file downloads are offered for the image sets.
Quality looks good. Images are professionally shot and offer really great quality to prove it (1600 pixels). The newest videos stream up to 2000k (640x480) and look nice.
The forum is pretty active, and they have some nice features come in with famous posters now and again. Member participation is pretty high too, with lots of user ratings and comments for many of the shoots. Model information is given for each girl, too.
Reduced price for TBP users. Instead of the original price tag of $24.95 per month, TBP users can get in on the action for less than $20 bucks per month.
Cross-linked tagging of content for similar shoots.
The Cons
Older Content Quality May Be Lacking.
Older content quality is not as good, and even some newer videos don't always offer the same consistent quality. Many clips still stream closer to 2100k (640x480) in WMV format. Also, download options could be more consistent at times.
No Date Stamps or Clear Update Schedule.
At least I couldn't find one. Although the tour and even the member's area advertises new daily additions, there are no date stamps or site update news to verify this. In fact, according to my count, the total number of videos hasn't increased that much at all since my last review here about a year ago.
Minor Negatives:
Not a whole lot of site personality. You're definitely paying for content here, not personality. There are no content descriptions or scene info anywhere, although bio stats are offered for the models.
No in-browser (Flash) streams available.
The other
Hot or Not user ratings scaled 1-5.
Bottom Line
A glam site with the Twistys edge and Network access to boot.
For a Glam site with a large amount of content and awesome additional site access, you can't go wrong with this one. Blue Fantasies may not be the most "Glam" of Glam sites, but it does offer a large archive of gorgeous models in original content, great navigational features and just enough download options to keep your own hard drive archives growing quick, and coming back for more. The overall quality looks nice, especially the newest sets, but I think they could do better. I would love to see some super high res (HD) videos being added to really seal the deal. Overall though, this is a collection that is not to be missed, and the additional site access for one low monthly price is one incredible deal.
Site Details
About the Content:
Downloadable exclusive softcore photos and videos of beautiful glamour models.
Download Managers:
Yes, should work.
Channel Max: 8
Able to pause/resume.
Test Software: IDM
Outside Review dates and scores are submitted to us directly by the approved review site periodically. We have limited control over the scores displayed.
Site News
Latest 5 site announcements and webmaster info.
No Site News Submitted.
Webmaster(s): None Registered
Webmasters are site reps/owners who can register to offer additional site support and post site news. Are you a webmaster? Register Today!
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
Large Collection of Original Content.
Older Content Quality May Be Lacking.
