Adult Site Reviews

Advanced Search

Top Company Sites

1. 77.5

View All : Company Sites

Top Photography Sites

1. Met Art 95.0
2. Hegre Art 94.0
3. abbywinters 93.5
4. FTV Girls 93.5
5. 1 By Day 91.5
6. Twistys 90.5
7. MC Nudes 90.0
8. X-Art 90.0
9. Joy Mii 90.0
10. Digital Desire 90.0
11. Wow Girls 90.0
12. Explicite Art 89.0
13. DDF Busty 89.0
14. Errotica Archiv... 89.0
15. Erotic Beauty 89.0

View All : Photography Sites
Related Niches

1. Softcore - 853 Sites
2. Glamour - 502 Sites

View All : Niches
The Best Porn » Top Porn Sites » » Spencer's Review
Last Update: 12-31-69
Jump To: Site Facts - Review

Pay Site

This site features the photography of Richard Murrian and his guests...lovely women posing gently and seductively for the camera.

Primary Niche: Nude Photography
Secondary Niches: Glamour ModelsSoft Content

past review An archived review which has since been replaced by a newer review.


Pic Count:
Pic Quality:
Vid Count:
Vid Quality:

Grades have no direct impact on the overall score.

Grade Criteria

Review Log

  Visit Site

Disclaimer: TBP does make a commission from sales to this web-site. It's also how we keep our site 100% banner free. This does not affect the integrity of the review. If you found our site or this review helpful, we hope you'll support TBP by visiting this site from our link above. Thank you. Review by Spencer

Review by Spencer

Released Jan 22, '10 , Written Jan 18, '10

MUSE is up for review today, and it's an artistic photography site that showcases the work of Richard Murrian. It's a bit different from the other similar photography sites you'll come across in that they don't focus on numbers, or quantity here much at all. Instead, they focus on the content, the girls, and the images. Each set is only 15-20 photos max, and they go through each photo individually to edit it to perfection. The end product is nothing short of awesome, with beautiful images, and beautiful art. Videos are not a main priority here either, though some can be found from a few years back. $25 gets you in for the first month, which drops to $19 a month if you stick around after that.

The Pros

  Very unique photos that look awesome.

As mentioned earlier, the photos are very unique here, and look fantastic. As much as artistic photography sites are different from general porn sites, MUSE is even unique in the artistic photography world. The images take on a life of their own, and set themselves apart from the crowd. Every detail seems to be considered from the girl, to the location, to the lighting, to the clothing, to the editing. They create interesting photos that speak more than just the generic nudes you see on most porn sites out there.

  Content options are good.

Photos come in three different sizes of course, as well as a zip file (though there's only one zip file available for the largest photos). Videos come in three options as well including Quicktime, DivX, and an M4V for your iPod.

Other Good Stuff:

  • The extras here are interesting, with my favorite being the tutorials for photography and photoshop They also offer a blog that's updated when they add new content, some e-cards, items for sale, etc.

The Cons

  Video quality could be better.

Granted, these videos were shot back in 2006-2007, so the quality issues are to be expected I guess. However, when the photographs look so nice, it's a little surprising when their videos don't hold up that tradition. They look a bit small and grainy at times, and definitely should be up in the HD range if it was new content shot today.

  Videos haven't been updated in 2 years.

As I just mentioned, all the videos here are from 2-3 years ago for some reason, and I don't think they're adding new videos anytime soon. I think they need to re-launch this section with current content, and keep it updated regularly. Even though it's a photography site first, people love seeing even behind-the-scenes videos to get that much of a better look at the models.

  Photo updates are random, can be slow.

There's no real rhyme or reason to the update schedule that I can figure out. There have been no updates in 1.5 months currently, but there were two additions in December, and a few in November. I hope this is a temporary break for the holidays almost a month ago instead of a slowing down here.

  Galleries are pretty small usually.

It's part of their mantra, so it's to be expected I guess, but it still deserves mentioning. The pick the best of the best in terms of the photos from their shoots, and then they painstakingly edit them to even more perfection. Because of that, most galleries have about 15 photos total, which is much smaller than we're used to seeing.

Minor Negatives:

  • The site does not remember your selection for photo sizes, and always defaults to the medium size. I chose the large photos, but had to do it each time I opened a new gallery.
  • Funny enough, there's no models index here to choose a girl from, and they have no info or bio on the models either unfortunately. I think it would add some good personality if we knew a bit more about them.
  • For some reason, they don't offer any streaming or Flash videos, which may annoy some.

Bottom Line

The site and updates are just so-so here, but the photography is some of the best out there.

I guess you can't fault these poor photographers for not being able to keep up with the techno-porn companies out there today. MUSE is no different, as everything from the site, to the options (mostly navigation), to the update schedule are worse than you'd see on a normal porn site. However, where they excel here is in the content and the photography. The images are incredibly unique, sexy, and interesting. They're well-composed, well-lit, well-edited, and well-selected. The girls look fantastic, and if you check out some of the tutorials on how they fix them up, much of that comes from the word involved after the photo is taken. Richard does pick girls with an innate beauty at least, and then compliments it perfectly with his unique style. Come here to enjoy what he has to offer as art, and you should be easily able to look past the other areas of the site which may be lacking.

Site Details

About the Content: 
Photography site featuring beautiful girls in very unique images, all shot by photographer Richard Murrian. Some videos available as well.

Download Managers: 
Yes, should work.
Channel Max: 9
Able to pause/resume.
Test Software: IDM

Download Speed: 
Download Mgr: 5.8MB/sec.
Browser: 1.2MB/sec.
(55MB video, 50Mbps cable internet)

Exclusive Info: 
Advertised: 100% exclusive.
My Opinion: Yes, it looks like they shoot all their own content here.

File Sizes (HQ): 
JPG = ~600KB
ZIP = ~10MB
MOV = ~25MB
DIVX = ~25MB
M4V = ~15MB
(average size, HQ)

HD Video: 
No HD quality videos.

Live Cams: 
No free live cam shows.

Logging In: 
Basic browser login box.
Videos don't require pw.

Model Appearance: 
Mostly white models.
Generally amateur-looking.
Body types from thin to average.

Model Info: 
50 models total.
Ages 18-27.

Other Content: 
Slow blog.
Sells mobile phone wallpaper.

Other Details: 
Loud music in most videos.

Pic Details: 
Professional level photography.
Little to no airbrushing.
Good lighting, bright colors.

Pic Dimensions (HQ): 
Recent = 2526 x 1691
Archives = 2000 x 1330

Streaming Player: 
No in-browser playback available.

Updates in Last 7 Days: 
No updates in about 1.5 months.
(updates vary, with usually 1-2 new sets per month)

Re-Review Status
No Plans Yet

Nominate this site (see the nominate box) if you'd like to see a new review.
We do not have an active member pass required to do a new review.


Back to: Current Review

Contact Us - FAQ's - Glossary - Announcements - Privacy Policy - Porn Reviews - Webmasters


Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP!  We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction?  We recommend this helpful resource.

Copyright © 2003-2007, Inc. and its licensors. All Rights Reserved.