Adult Site Reviews

Advanced Search

Top Network Sites

1. DDF Network 94.0
2. Reality Kings 94.0
3. Perfect Gonzo 93.5
4. Only All Sites 93.0
5. Brazzers 92.0
6. 21 Sextreme 91.5
7. Porn Pros Netwo... 91.0
8. Dog Fart Networ... 91.0
9. Nubiles Porn 90.5
10. Team Skeet 90.5
11. Hustler 90.0
12. Tainster 90.0
13. 90.0
14. Teen Mega World 90.0
15. Pornstar Platin... 90.0

View All : Network Sites
Related Niches

1. BDSM - 198 Sites
2. Specialty - 193 Sites
3. Bizarre - 109 Sites
4. Extreme - 80 Sites
5. Webcams - 35 Sites

View All : Niches
The Best Porn » Top Porn Sites » Ferro Network » Vanessa's Review

Ferro Network


With over 50 individual sites, this network is massive and contains so much variety, but has a strong focus on legs, nylons, pantyhose and feet. You'll spend countless hours perusing this fantastic collection.

Primary Niche: All Fetishes
Secondary Niches: Legs and NylonsHardcore Sex

past review An archived review which has since been replaced by a newer review.


Pic Count:
Pic Quality:
Vid Count:
Vid Quality:

Grades have no direct impact on the overall score.

Grade Criteria

Review Log

  Visit Site

Disclaimer: TBP does make a commission from sales to this web-site. It's also how we keep our site 100% banner free. This does not affect the integrity of the review. If you found our site or this review helpful, we hope you'll support TBP by visiting this site from our link above. Thank you.
Ferro Network Review by Vanessa Ferro Network

Review by Vanessa

Released Oct 14, '11 , Written Oct 8, '11

I've already had the chance to review quite a few of the Ferro Network sites and it looks like now it's my turn to review the complete Network. There are a lot of unique niches covered here; mainly pantyhose, but also anal, MILF, shemale, strapon, lesbian and more. Between the incredibly large number of sites (currently about 59), users get access to more than 25,350 videos, 2 million images, and new updates that come in often across the board with some sites no longer updating, new sites coming in, and others that continue to. Initially a membership here will set you back almost $85 bucks, which then recurs at a lower but still somewhat pricey $49.95 per month thereafter.

The Pros

  Large Network of Niche Specific Content.

If your thing is sexy women in pantyhose, mature women in pantyhose, trannies in pantyhose, or any niche specific themed content featuring people having sex, look no further. The Ferro Network offers access to about 59 niche themed sites that are each unique, but most cover the pantyhose theme and do it well. The videos & image sets offer mostly boy-girl content with a focus on the pantyhose, wearing them, spreading them, etc., but across the Network of sites you will also find lesbians, old men with teens, strapons, and more.

  Some Good Quality Content.

Quality here has always been just a step above average and quite a few video clips that have been added that are being offered at 2000k (640x480) and look really nice. They're not perfect, but they do look good! Image sizing has always been just a step above average and the current 1500x1000 pixel shots look pretty good.

The sites that offer the newest videos with HD specs are looking really good. Bitrate speeds are around 3300k, and although not perfect, the quality does indeed look very nice.

Other Good Stuff:

  • Across the sites users can expect updates about daily. The sites themselves offer update logs, but without one in the main Network area it's hard to say for sure which sites are updating or not and how often exactly.
  • Zip file downloads for image sets.

The Cons

  Main Network Design is Not Well Integrated.

Other than a listing of the sites and an updates page that features content updates (no date stamps), there is no easy way to access each individual site without leaving the Network page and users must enter in their user & password each time. A more integrated design where users can access all sites and their content within one Network hub would be such an improvement.

  Individual Site Design is Plain. No Browse or User Features.

The member's area design is as basic as it gets. For example, videos are listed 4 to a page, totaling in more than X pages worth of content. Image sets are listed 6 to a page with about X pages worth of content. There are no content categories, tags, scene descriptions or any additional tools/features for browsing content.

  No Model Index, Bios or Scene Info.

Lack of a model index not only impacts browsing, but it also takes away from the sites personality. All content is listed with a model name, so why no offer model pages, a little bit of bio information and some scene info to round it all out?

  Video Format Varies/Not Enough Download Options.

It seems as though all files are AVI/WMV or some other format with bitrates around 2000k-3300k (640x480). None of the content is labeled as to what type of format, nor are there alternative options for download.

Minor Negatives:

  • Many sites may no longer be updating. For instance, a few of the sites I've reviewed recently hadn't seen anything new added since the beginning of 2011. With a Network this large, that fairly normal, however.
  • Each individual site can be accessed for $29.95, but if you want access to this complete Network, it's rather pricey at $84.95 initially, which then recurs at $49.95 per month.

Bottom Line

A Network full of great pantyhose & other fetish content, but $ & not without problems.

Although there is a large part of me that can't get past the lack of model & scene info within the Ferro Network of sites, there is another fetish-loving part of me that also can't get past how great the variety of niche themed content it, specifically when it comes to the pantyhose theme. These people know their pantyhose fetish material and they produce it well. Newest videos on sites can be seen in HD quality, while other sites may no longer be updating at all. What I really wish for here is a more integrated design that makes accessing each site and it's content much, much easier from one main Network hub. For almost $85 bucks, then $50 recurring, this really shouldn't be too much to ask.

Site Details

About the Content: 
Downloadable exclusive scenes, generally hardcore in nature, in a very wide variety of niches. Lots of mature, pantyhose, strapons, shemale, anal, gay, and more.

Download Managers: 
Yes, should work.
Channel Max: 3
Able to pause/resume.
Test Software: IDM

Download Speed: 
Download Mgr: 1.7MB/sec.
Browser: 550KB/sec.
(291MB video, 20Mbps cable internet)

Exclusive Info: 
Advertised: 100% exclusive.
My Opinion: Yes, I don't think I've seen this content anywhere else. It appears that the Ferro Network shoots their own content.

File Sizes (HQ): 
JPG = ~300KB
ZIP = ~25MB
WMV/AVI/MPG = ~100MB-400MB
(average size, HQ)

HD Video: 
Yes, latest videos.
File Type: WMV
Bit-Rate: 3300k
Dimensions: 1280x720
Quality: Decent overall.

Logging In: 
Only user/pw required.
user/pw required more than once to go in & during my visit.
Each site requires users/pw re-entry.
Saved after closing browser.
Users must register their IP.
Very inconvenient.

Model Appearance: 
Mix of model types.
Mostly amateur-looking to model-types.
Body types from thin to BBW.

Model Info: 
Thousands of models total.
Ages unknown, but young to older.

Other Content: 
No notable extras.

Other Details: 
Condoms may be used, but no always.
No music in most videos.

Pic Details: 
Amateur to pro level.
Some sets airbrushed/touched up.
Good lighting in most images.
Mostly indoor photography.
Sharp at full size.

Pic Dimensions (HQ): 
Recent = 1505 x 1000
Archives = 1024 x 768
Sizes vary a little.

Streaming Player: 
No in-browser playback available.

Updates in Last 7 Days: 
Daily updates spread across the sites.
Some sites no longer update.

Re-Review Status
Review Completed

New review has been completed on Feb 3, 2015 and will be released in less than a week.
We have an active member pass required to do a new review.

Back to: Current Ferro Network Review

Contact Us - FAQ's - Glossary - Announcements - Terms Of Service - Privacy Policy - DMCA - 2257 - Porn Reviews - Webmasters


  Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.

To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.

All Rights Reserved © 2003-2018 Design and Reviews are copyrighted.