OFFICIAL
75.5
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 05-13-08 |
|
1. Hardcore amateur content.
2. Updates often.
1. Content quality is inconsistent & average to below.
2. Site design could be improved.
3. No model index or bios.
4. Not enough viewing/download options.
"An average amateur site that doesn't deliver all that is promised in the tour." |
|
|
Xrated Amateur Movies features hardcore movies of amateur girls having sex. The tour passes itself off as some dude's "private collection", with models that him or his friends have fucked. Who knows what the real deal is, but I can tell you that $29.95 per month gives users access to more than 105+ videos and 102+ image galleries. As a bonus, each month you remain a member a new bonus site is added to the mix, and photo or video updates are added often. The site design does take some getting used to, and the exclusivity of the content is questionable, but the hardcore action is super hot!
The Good:
- A nice-sized collection of (mostly) hardcore and softcore content. Videos are broken down into categories: softcore, hardcore, anal sex, big boobs, group sex, girl-girl, solo, teens, mature, etc. so that gives you a taste of the kind-of action you can expect. Amateur images are simply broken down into either hardcore or softcore categories.
- Updates often. Between image sets and videos, member's can expect updates every 1-2 days or so.
- JM, your "webmaster" here does a good job of giving users content descriptions, making the content feel more relatable to members, whether it's exclusive or not.
- Bonus site access every month you remain a member. This will give users access to additional content, which adds to the overall value of the site.
The Bad:
- Content quality ranges and is usually average to below. "High quality" video streams average between 500k and 850k and images average around 1024x760 pixels, the quality of which varies from set to set. Some of the content feels very amateur in style, while other content looks to be more "professionally shot".
- Site design is cluttered and hard to get used to. I appreciate that they offer some sort of categories for the content, but figuring out what's what and where's where isn't easy or clear by any means.
- No model index or "bio" information. If these dudes really are landing all this amateur pussy, why not list the girls and give a few quick stats about them? It would really add to the overall personality of the site.
The Conclusion:
Based on the inconsistencies in quality and production of the content, I'd have to guess that not everything here is as exclusive as the tour might lead you to believe. With that being said, this is a nice-sized archive of hardcore amateur content, which I found enjoyable in terms of "action" on many levels. Unfortunately, lack of quality was a turn-off to the content, and getting around wasn't always so easy. I feel the price is too high for what you get, but the additional site access for loyal members is an added bonus to join, and/or stick around.
|
