OFFICIAL
76.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Maggie |
Initial Review: 05-08-08 |
|
1. Good amount of content.
2. Frequent updates.
3. Pictures look good.
1. Design could be a bit cleaner.
2. Videos could look better.
3. Not sure about exclusivity.
"A fine amateur site that didn't really disappoint or impress me much." |
|
|
X Rated Amateur Movies presents “first time amateur girls getting fucked on film”. The tour states that they’re “real next door girls” who “never dreamed of having sex on film”. Many of these cute, mostly young, models do have a wholesome look to them. That is, until they bend over and take it in their ass! These babes have no qualms exploring their sexuality on camera for the first time.
The Goods –
There’s a good amount of content to enjoy here. There are currently around a hundred videos and galleries on the site. They’ve got plenty of both softcore and hardcore, and even fill out categories like anal, groupsex, lesbians, teens, and matures.
Updates come just about 4 or so times a week. They alternate between picture and video updates, so it’s nice that both section of the site are growing and that both photo and video fans will be entertained.
The pictures look good. They vary somewhat, but overall most of the sets look surprisingly professional. They’re well-lit and nicely done. It looks like a pro took many of these scenes.
The Bads –
I’m not so sure about the exclusivity of these scenes. There’s not a lot of consistency to them. Some of the pictures are smaller than others, some of the girls look more like pornstars and others like amateurs, some of the locations look like studios and others like homes, etc. I suppose it’s possible that the content is exclusive but just not original, and is purchased from a variety of sources, but overall I’m not sure.
The videos could look sharper. The “high quality” clips max out at 800k and generally look pretty grainy. I know they have the word “amateur” in their title, but the videos could definitely look better (particularly since they also have the word “Movies” in their title).
The design could be a bit cleaner. I appreciate that they’re trying to give members a lot of information, but it’s just too much on every page. There are too many links, titles, dates, categories, and etc on each page.
Conclusion –
If you’re looking for a nice mix of softcore and hardcore pictures and videos that look somewhere between amateur and professional, X Rated Amateur Movies is worth a try. There’s room for improvement in a couple areas, but all in all it’s a fine site. It’s not cheap, at $30 a month, but updates come often enough to make it worth a look for fans of the site.
|
