|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
15.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
10.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
1.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 11-19-04 |
| Follow-Up Review(s): 11-18-05 |
|
1. Huge database of content.
2. Real user submitted pics.
1. Average quality content.
2. Not many hot chicks.
"A huge content database full of real people who put themselves out there for all to see." |
|
|
World Wide Wives seems like one of those sites where people will either really like it or have no use for it at all. The reason is these are pictures and videos of real amateur people, you know, the common folks. It's about as far away as you can get from the sexy young porn star sluts featured on most paysites. My rule of thumb is it's the very average looking women who are most likely she is to be a swingers and/or exhibitionists (of course there are exceptions and it's just a theory, but I think sites like World Wide Wives and similar communities support my claim). So back to my original point, if it's real amateur middle-aged women you want then this site is right up your alley. If not, then there's nothing here for you.
The biggest thing World Wide Wives has going in its favor is the 5+ years of archives. The galleries date back to 1999 and considering additions are made daily that makes for a massive collection of material. Then number of pictures is staggering at over 800,000. There's a big drop-off when it comes to videos, those number 400+ which is still a respectable amount considering they're all user submitted clips.
This may not be the prettiest site to look at yet I find it very easy to use. The four main sections seem logical to me: 1. PLUS (nude pics); 2. HARDCORE; 3. .TV (videos); and 4. WILLIES (men). The most recent day's addition is at the top of each section and archives are easily accessible with month and year drop down menus. The mechanisms they're using might be simple but it really works well. Furthermore, I like the gallery pages even better with their "Contact Me" and "Search 4 Me" tools. It's possible to contact a submitter via email, on the message board, or in the chatroom. Search 4 Me pulls up all the other galleries and videos featuring the submitter. Something I did notice is the oldest years of 1999-2001 have pages that look completely different, I guess they did a redesign and didn't bother updated those.
Picture quality is about what I expected for submitted pics. Most look average and there are wide variations in quality, many of the older ones from back in the early days are unimpressive and small. That comes with the territory though, so I'm not surprised. The same goes for the videos. They're very short clips averaging around 30 seconds to a minute in length and they're not impressive quality.
The posting system, message board, and chat room are all simple features which round out the site and make it a community. Both the chat board and message board have lots of activity. It appears the site operators aren't standing still. A new "Shots" section is coming soon and will have Hot Shots (best rated galleries), Boot Shots (boot galleries), and Outdoor Shots (public nudity). On a final note the $14.99/mo price which is certainly good if this is the type of content you're looking for.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 11-18-05 |
World Wide Wives was already a massive collection of real amateurs and now it's even bigger. Last time around the "SHOTS" category was in the works and now it's online with 9 sub-categories. That's triple the number they had advertised when it was in the works. It seems they've also completely updated the old gallery pages to conform to the newer site design. Do you know how rare it is to arrive at a site for a follow-up review and see that they've followed through on launching their new section AND corrected a former problem? I'm flabbergasted. The site's best assets remain the huge database of real amateur women and the regular updates. Varying content quality is still a sticking point although that'll always be an issue here due to the nature of the site.
Score increased from 76.7 to 80.0.
|
