|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
48.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 01-25-05 |
|
1. All video content.
2. Bonus site access.
1. Avg video quality.
2. High price.
"The site is more softcore than I expected, mostly girls stripping for crowds of drunk dudes." |
|
|
Wet Wild & Wasted does indeed feature videos of girls getting freaky and naked on camera. That being said, I have to take issue with the types of action emphasized on the free tour. All three samples on the tour's main page show public guy/girl and girl/girl sex when in actuality the member's videos are dominated by more softcore scenes like stripping competitions, wet t-shirt contests, girls flashing, and girls kissing. Most of what's here could be classified as softcore. Also, on the join page there's a promise of access to "65+ Premium Websites" which is a stretch to say the least. It is accurate that members get access to other sites from this company (such as Public Flash & Black Dicks White Chicks) but most of the other "sites" are leased 3rd party content from Ill Content and other companies. Now that that's clear, I will say this leased material is actually pretty decent stuff with videos that actually play in a normal Media Player not a stupid in-browser stream. Also, the majority is public nudity, flashing, amateur, or coed material meaning it relates well to the site's proprietary content. Believe it or not, I think members might actually find this stuff worth watching. Even so, the boast to potential members of access to 65+ sites is definitely misleading.
The site's 58+ videos are laid out on one simple page. There's no information, summary, or even a title that would help describe the action. The titles are simply "Wet Wild and Wasted 1, 2, 3, etc.). You can forget about categorization too, there's none of that. Members are left with the hunt and peck method of sifting through the videos to find the kind of action desired.
The downloadable videos are average quality WMV files of which most are watchable while some are just way to grainy for my tastes. If desired, members can also stream the videos in an in-browser player. Each movie is made up of 5 to 20 clips, each around 2 to 5 minutes long.
So how much fun are the Wet Wild & Wasted movies? I suppose the user ratings features speaks best to that. On a 10-star scale most of the movies had user rating in the 3-5 star range, which isn't too impressive. Personally, I thought some deserved better, but I suppose this content is fairly run-of-the-mill for true fans of spring break and public nudity sites. The $34.95/mo price tag isn't helping either, for that much dough I'd expect more in return in the form of better video quality, more browsing tools, or more on-site content. As it stands now, it's just overpriced.
|
