|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
15.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
58.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. New site looks great!
2. Lots of updates.
3. Lots of lovely naked ladies!
1. Picture quality is very inconsistent.
2. Some generic content mixed in there now.
"There's a lot of good content here, though I hope the filler stuff isn't their new focus." |
|
|
Welcome to the Wetlands, where wives get NAKED! The gretting upon entering the site pretty much sums up what to expect for entertainment here. Unfortunately that's all you'll really find on the tour is a bunch of promises of naked husbands and wives inside. You don't really get a good impression for what specifically they offer. Who's inside? Any samples of the type of pics we'll see? I guess that's why we're here, to give you a better idea of what you'll get inside ;-)
My initial thought once inside the members area was that it seemed a bit cluttered. I guess I like things a little more simple - give me a link to the photos, or videos, or the chatroom. Here it seems like there's multiple entrances to each, which unfortunately seems to detract from the overall effect of their large amounts of content.
Anyhow, I first checked out the "our wives" section. Man the webmaster here sure has a ton of wives!! Already here there's at least 100 ladies of various ages and types to check out. A lot of these wives have only one or two sets, but there are a few outliers with many galleries. The biggest shock once you get to the pics is the huge variance in picture quality. Contrary to some of the other sites we've been reviewing, these pics don't seem to be all shot by one (or a couple) people. Rather it looks like 100 different husbands shot pics of 100 different wives and they are all presented here. I don't think this is a real bad thing, since it allows us to see all brand new faces (and boobs) that we wouldn't have seen before. But it does make the picture galleries rather inconsistent. A decent amount of the galleries look really good, but the ones that don't can look really, really bad. I guess it's like a box of chocolates or something (thanks Forrest Gump).
Browse around some more and you'll find galleries split up into categories so you can find more what you're looking for - from bondage, to lesbian, to the husbands of these ladies even.
Wandering into the video section, I decided to search for some cumshot videos to see what came up. I check out one of the "high stream" videos, and it starts to download. 99 megs is what it was! And they don't stream! Man, I switch over to the low quality version to check it out, which is estimated to come in in 4 minutes (10 megs). So I wait, and wait. Once the video pops open, I'm very disappointed with the quality. It's hardly even a movie, it looks like an upload from a home computer running on a 28.8 modem or something. Maybe the high quality would be better, but this is hardly worth it for me. Plus the fact that you don't get any real preview of what's coming (no thumbnails or anything, just a generic one-liner description).
A few others had some serious problems even getting the video to play. Windows Media 8 won't cut it (which in fairness they told you to make to have the latest version of everything), but even Windows Media 9 forces you to download and save the file to your computer before viewing (if you try to just "open" it at the dialogue to a temporary folder, WM Player lets you know it can't find that video after waiting for 5 minutes to download it). Its just a lot of hassle for something that's not great anyhow.
Focusing on the positives, they have a ton of naked wives for you to check out in photos. They say they have some 74 gigs of video too in their archives, but for the pain in the ass it is to get into, I just don't see that as being a big draw. If you're into everyday couples stripping and fucking on cam, this site will tickle your fancy. I prefer the consistancy provided by other sites, but here it would detract from the amount of ladies they feature. The quantity of content, and frequency of updates keep this site going strong. But personally I think you'll either love it or hate it - and that's for you to decide.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 08-24-05 |
Man, what a difference a day makes! Wait, I mean a year. Oh... two years? Geez it's been a long ass time since we've been here. I'm pleasantly surprised to see a brand new member's area (though the tour looks the same I think) that's quite pleasing to the eye, and makes getting around a ton easier. There's some new search features and a few decent ways to browse around the content which really helps here.
With the good comes some bad of course. First, the price is up a little to $25 a month, which still isn't too bad a deal. The other thing I noticed is that there's a good amount of non-exclusive content thrown in there now that I don't remember seeing before. There's some some good true amateur content from what I can tell, but the main allure of this site before was all the wives you wouldn't get to see if it weren't for the Wetlands. Now if they're mixing in content you've seen a hundred times before, that's definitely going to hurt things. It's not a huge part of the site now, but it will be interesting to follow on our next followup (in like 2014 at the rate we go evidently).
For now, the new look definitely helps, though I think in the end I'm going to keep the score pretty similar with the few negatives I found as well.
Score increased from 81.3 to 82.5.
|
