|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 09-02-08 |
|
1. Additional site access.
2. Some nicer looking videos.
3. Niche specific content.
1. Many video sizes are extremely small (320x240).
2. No browse, user or download options.
3. Expensive for what it offers.
"A small site with small videos and a large join fee." |
|
|
I'm always amazing by how lady-like some of these shemales you find on websites look. And then sometimes I'm a little surprised they're even trying to be feminine at all. WeRateShemales.com is the home of 29+ shoots featuring a handful of ladyboys, all of which can be rated by members on a 1-5 point scale. This is a new site to the world of online porno, but new updates are consistently added each week. Also, your membership here gives additional site access including Ladyboy Juice and Shemale Juice, neither of which I've had the chance to see yet. The initial cost is somewhat expensive ($34.95) for what you get at this point, but the recurring price drops to $29.95 each month you remain a member.
The Good:
- Niche specific content of ethnic shemales posing nude and having sex. The actual quality of these ladyboys ranges, but then again, that's up to you to decide as members are encouraged to rate sets.
- Updates appear to be coming weekly. Based on the date stamps on content, it seems as though new image galleries & videos are being added each week.
- Some nice looking full-length videos (inconsistent). However, many of the video sizes were as small as 320x240, which doesn't really make for good viewing.
The Bad:
- Small video sizes. Like I just mentioned above, many of the video picture sizes were very small, which pretty much negates the idea of a 1400k bitrate.
- Small site/expensive join fee. Although additional site access is offered, and the recurring price drops about $5 bucks after the first month, I really can't see myself joining a site this small and random for $30-35 bucks. It's just too much.
- Minimal content/model information & no browse or download features. Basically it's click and play with a small amount of text to describe the scene.
The Conclusion:
There are many shemale sites out there these days, and at least a handful that are extremely successful at it. We Rate Shemales is not currently one of them in my book. The price is too high, the site is too small and so are many of the videos. Some of the ladyboys are downright nasty too (purely my opinion). If I had been more interested by the site I might have actually taken the time to rate them as such. But I digress; WeRateShemales.com has a long ways to go if they want a recommendation from me.
|
