|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 08-15-07 |
|
1. Quality looks okay.
2. Exclusive content.
3. Smooth site design.
1. Lack of a clear update schedule & updates.
2. Small site.
3. No full-length video downloads.
"I'd pass for now but Virtual Models has some potential." |
|
|
Virtual-Models.com is a POV site that features sexy chicks masturbating and having sex with each other in such a way that one could try to imagine themselves in the mix. Unfortunately I don't think the site is as successfully done as it could have been, and there's not really a whole lot of content to check out, with only 13+ girls online so far. Those 13+ girls comprise a total of 17+ image sets and 13+ videos, and no date stamps or update schedule to clue you in on just how often you can expect to see more. A membership here costs $19.95 per month.
The Good:
- The 13+ models that are online currently are super hot & sexy babes. Most of them are in their 20's and a bio sheet gives some basic stats and information. You will find lots of solo sets & poses as well as some girl-girl toy scenes, and most image sets also come with a video.
- Site design is smooth and easy enough to browse. Also, some nice download options are offered and include DivX, QuickTime and a Windows Media stream. Images are offered in small & large formats with a zip file download.
- Pretty good quality content even though the color contrast was too much at times. Large image sizes are as big as 1610x1210 pixels and streams go as high as 1000k, although they can tend to look pixilated.
The Bad:
- Simply put, there just isn't enough content here to justify the costs, especially considering there is no clear update schedule to fill you in on what's coming next and when.
- I didn't really see how the content always fit in with the virtual models theme, although the ones that did were great. Maybe there just wasn't enough of it, but the production of the content didn't always make me feel like I was in on the action.
- Videos are broken down into parts without the option for a full-length download.
The Conclusion:
I'm not sure how much I would pay for this site, but I surely wouldn't pay almost $20 bucks per month. There just isn't enough content or entertainment value to justify it. I didn't really see how this is a "virtual model" or POV site either (some shoots were better than others). To me it just felt like general solo/girl-girl content. Given some time to grow I might be more interested in what Virtual-Models has to offer, but they have some real work to do first.
|
