OFFICIAL
76.5
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
18.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 05-04-05 |
|
1. Videos look great!
2. Updates are coming pretty regularly.
1. Photos don't look that good.
2. A bit expensive.
3. Could use some growth still.
"The site was a little disappointing till I saw their videos, which made everything better!" |
|
|
I was kinda glad when I saw our site up for review today called UK Nymphos. I get a kick out of watching videos with foreign women and hearing their accents as they chat while masturbating (that's pretty normal to talk during masturbation isn't it?). They have a pretty basic, but nice-looking, tour that seems to show all hardcore action which isn't a bad thing either. Pay up your $30 (which only recurs at $25 if you want to stick around after the first month), and you can get out the nymphos in action inside the member's area.
Once you get inside, all the pretty graphics disappear. The member's area is a very plain blue with yellow and white text site that looks nothing like the tour did. Getting around is pretty easy via the menu up top thankfully, just make sure you hover over the link first so the real link pops up; clicking the initial "picture" link won't do much until the submenu comes up. Unfortunately it is a disappointment to see the differences in designs here.
I went to the picture section first, which has four pages of 12 galleries each on them. It's not huge, and the content seems to vary a bit from set to set. I would guess that these aren't exclusive based on looking at them, but I guess you never know these days. Pictures are a pretty standard 800x600 or so, but can fall a little below that as well. Quality surprised me a bit, as it was just okay in my book. Some sets look nicer, but a lot are pretty plain to me. There aren't any special browsing features either, which isn't helping anything!
The videos section looks much the same. It looks like they break their movies into small downloadable clips in Windows Media format as the only option. I don't mind that, though I would love to see a full-scene option as well. The videos were a pretty big surprise considering I didn't like the photos much, as all of them I checked out came in at 768x576 and 2000kbps! Where'd those come from?? They obviously looked very nice as well, even blown up to full-screen mode. I didn't get much British-accent masturbation action, but the hardcore scenes at such high quality more than made up for it. This section also felt a bit more cohesive, as though they might be exclusive to the site. They don't say much either way, but that's my guess at least.
New stuff seems to come out several times per week, with a new movie coming a little less than once a week or so. Overall, it's a weird site here. The site itself and the pictures were a bit sub-par for me. But once you got into the videos section, it was a whole different story. You've got some very nice-looking hardcore videos here, which is the only reason I'd join. I'd the site could use some growth overall, and I'd definitely like to see a new layout here. Still, I'm glad to see it's better than I thought in the beginning!
|
