OFFICIAL
75.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
54.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.5 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Good niche content.
2. They enjoy what they do.
3. Not too expensive.
1. Quality could still be improved.
2. Updates are a little slower than hoped for.
3. Could use a little redesign.
"Some decent exclusive content here, though the presentation could be better." |
|
|
At my house, we throw parties for birthdays, holidays, and once in a while to just have fun. At Tampa Bukkake they have parties to have guys shoot loads all over chicks faces - that sounds like a lot of fun if you ask me. If you're reading this, you probably already know what bukkake is, but for those of you who don't it's basically a large group of men cumming all over a chick. This site specializes in it, so if that sounds interesting then read on.
Their site is part of The Stall network, which has some "interesting" sites should you ever want to check it out. Your $20 a month gets you access there as well, which is great. Checking out the site, it's got a lot of text! That warning page is pretty impressive with all they fit in there without graphics, lol. The member's area looks a bit better, but still has an amateur feel to it.
All the site offers is content for the most part, so it's pretty simple to get around. They break up their scenes by year, and then by party/description. They have links to photos, a full video, and video clips right on the splash page. They don't give a ton of info on the party, which is a little disappointing since you're left figuring it out yourself from the content.
Most of the content is very amateur in nature, and vary a bit in what they offer. Some sets jump right into the hardcore action, while others just seem to have random party-like pictures with no sex at all at times. Pictures are on the small side, and always come in with a height of 480 pixels. That means you get 640x480 (which are small), and 360x480 which are tiny! They're actual images, but most of the fun is in the video.
Videos are all Windows Media format, and as I said before have full-video options or clips. They also have quite an amateur feel to them, but look decent. They are 320x240 and about 250kbps. The picture quality isn't the best, but what they're showing is pretty cool. They don't really follow a standard format since each party is different, but generally you'll see some blowjobs and cumshots for sure. They may not always be solely bukkake in nature, but there's usually at least some hardcore going on somewhere to keep you interested.
My big problem here comes in from the size of the site, and from the update schedule. We're almost all the way through 2004, and there are only 21 scenes up from this year. I guess that amounts to about one every other week, which isn't as bad as I was thinking, but you're not getting a guaranteed new scene on a regular schedule. They have parties going back to 2001, so there's a decent amount to look at. Plus, you have the whole network to check out if you want to see more.
It's a decent site for what it is. The content doesn't look fantastic, and neither does the site. But I think they're having fun doing what they do, and it shows. While there are a few things I'd change if I could, it's a nice site for the cum lover in you, and is worth a look - especially at the price.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 03-31-06 |
Well, well, things look a little better here than last time. The site has been growing pretty steadily it seems, though not quite at a weekly pace. Thankfully the overall size is now pretty decent I'd say. Quality has also been bumped up a little (which was definitely a necessity), though they waited so long that they're getting behind the times again already (they're at 500kbps or so, while newer sites are up to 640x480 and 1000kbps on average I'd say). Still, the content is fun, the quality is better, the site is bigger, so it can't be all that bad.
Score increased from 73.3 to 75.0.
|
