|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
53.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 07-05-05 |
|
1. Weekly cam show.
2. Pictures look decent.
3. Nice price.
1. Updates don't have dates.
2. No journal/diary online.
3. Could use some growth.
"A very basic amateur site here, with few frills but a nice price." |
|
|
You gotta love the internet for letting normal, everyday chicks show off naked for you that you'd never get to see in real life. Sweet Juliette is a prime example, as it doesn't look like she's ever done any modeling or anything before according to her bio. Yet she's pretty cute and very horny, which seems like a good combination in a woman. Her tour design is a little plain, but maybe that means she runs the site on her own. The $10 price tag is a nice bonus to see, as long as she offers something inside at least!
Once inside the member's area, I thought I was going crazy with the same menu present that you saw on the tour. Turns out she added a second (member's only) menu on the right side of the screen. To get to the pictures, though, you don't need to use it as they are listed right on the main page.
To find a gallery, you get three preview pictures and a title. Nothing is dated, so I'm not sure how often new sets are added. Her "what's new" page says something new is up once a week, though her schedule is a bit off right now as she's on vacation evidently. Most of her sets seem to be solo action only, though you'll see a friend added to the scene on a rare occasion. Browsing through a gallery is straightforward as well, though each thumb is pretty big (150x225 and 30kb on average) with only two per row which makes for a lot of scrolling. Picture quality was about what you'd expect on an amateur site with the newer sets looking a bit better than the older ones. Sizes ranged from a bit under, to a bit over, 800x600.
Videos have no previews to go off of, just the title and size/length. The good news is that they are all in a full-scene Windows Media Video, which is what I prefer if there's only one option. They are always 320x240, and can range from 300-600kbps from what I saw. They generally look fine, though still amateur in nature, and usually offer similar content as seen in the photos. I just wish the section was bigger, and offered an easier way to browse.
She does a member's only camshow once a week for a half hour only, but it seems to be a private thing so you don't get access to any networks or anything. There's also a few stories, a store, and a wish list if you're so inclined. Overall, the site is just okay, but the $10 reflects that I think. Mostly I think she needs some growth here, and I wouldn't mind seeing the extras and interaction bumped up a bit. 30 minutes is a pretty short cam show, and no diary or message board to hear from her hurts as well. Still, she's cute, has fun, and the site is cheap!
|
