|
Content
|
| Quality : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
5.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
50.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
|
1. Network access included.
2. Decent amount of content up.
1. They haven't grown much it seems.
2. Getting around is difficult.
3. Quality isn't good.
4. Expensive.
"After four years, I was really hoping to see a much better site than what they have now." |
|
|
The good thing about living in the suburbs is all the sluts that are around. You've seen them in your neighborhood a lot too, right? Well Suburban Sluts certainly has noticed this trend, and has made a whole site about it. The site may sound and look familiar to you, since we've looked at one of their other sites before called Suburban Amateurs. That site was pretty nice, and they've recently changed their membership option to include access to both of their sites (and their others) for the one price (which is $30 a month - a better deal now that you get all of their paysites). The one thing I wonder about with such similar sites is what the differences in the content are exactly.
Once inside, I went to their Suburban Sluts model's page, which has a decent/okay list of their models online right now. It was a little smaller than I was expecting around 70+ girls or so, but each girl has anywhere between 100-6,000 pics (though the latter is rare), which adds up for sure. There were less ways to browse than I like as well, as this view makes it tough to know what's new, etc. They do have an updates page, which covers both of their Suburban sites which is something I guess. However, 95%+ of the updates seem to be for their other site - that's a little disappointing.
Once you pick a girl, you're taken to her page which doesn't have any extra info on it unfortunately. They break the sets down by category, and link to her movies if she has any. Most of the pictures look okay, but not great really. They are all in the 800x600 range, which is fine. The newer ones look a little better, but those are hard to find here really.
About half of the girls have movies, and it's pretty easy to find those girls. There's no separate video section, however, if you're looking for that. They are offered in either one-minute clips or a full-video download, but all initially come in zip format which sucks. Open those up and you have a 352x288 Windows Media Video encoded at 520kbps. They look decent, though a little amateur here and there. I'm not sure what the benefit of the zip files are on their end, but I don't think they save a lot of space and just make it that much harder to watch for us.
Updates seem to come very, very slow here which is a shame. I think I like their other site better; thankfully you get access to them both now. I'd like to see some growth and updates to the quality, etc. on Suburban Sluts. Also, a more thorough member's area would be a nice addition. What they have up is fine, but I don't think I'd stick around for their site in particular - that's what the bonus sites are for, though.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 08-03-09 |
Wow, what a blast from the past. We haven't looked at Suburban Sluts in a few years, and I was surprised to still see them (kind of) alive here. Unfortunately, it's not all good news. They actually haven't grown a ton, as their main content section only has around 720 galleries and 150 videos or so. On top of that, the quality is pretty poor, especially by today's standards. I'm not sure if this is older content still, or what. Even worse, the price has gone up to a whopping $35 a month, which is just a lot of money even for a good site. You do get network access, but I don't think even that can help them out here much. I was expecting more content, better quality, and definitely not an even higher price tag.
Score decreased from 75.0 to 71.0.
|
