OFFICIAL
66.0
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
49.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
4.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 01-19-09 |
|
1. May be original gay content.
2. Additional site access.
1. Small site.
2. Updates have stalled.
3. Quality could be better.
4. No model or scene info.
"A small site that doesn't pull its weight for the price." |
|
|
Straight Wankers seems to think that even straight boys can't help but have gay sex if horny enough and the situation (or enough cash) presents itself. According to the stats listed in the tour, the member's area offers 173+ exclusive movies and 430+ exclusive photosets. Unfortunately, I'm not sure just what these guys are counting because there are clearly no more than 18+ videos and only 27+ image galleries inside. And since we've already had the chance to view some of this content before, I can tell you that the Network this site is a part of (called Boyextra) has been noted as having site clones. You do gain additional site access with your $29.95 monthly membership, but I can tell you now I'm not sure it’s worth it, especially considering the lack of updates within the last couple of months.
The Good:
- Appears to be original gay content featuring young "straight boys" having first time twink sex for cash. There are a few more photo galleries than videos, but the overall variety seems to keep things a little interesting.
- Simple site design. It's easy to get around here, even though there aren't really very many user/browse options. Image galleries are listed separate from the videos and the content is dated, unfortunately you won't find anything too recent.
The Bad:
- May no longer be updating. No new image content has been posted for almost 3+ months now, and no new videos have been added for almost 4+ months. For some reason I don't imagine they're going to start up again anytime soon either. In that case they should drop the overly expensive non-recurring membership option ($49.95), and simply offer the site up for a smaller fee.
- Content quality is average to below. You won't be blown away with the size and quality of the images or videos. All of the 18+ videos stream at about 1000k. That's just a smidge too far below average for a paysite these days.
- Content may be re-used on one of the other included sites. I would be willing to bet that the content here isn't 100% exclusive either. Either way, there is no model index or content information.
The Conclusion:
Once again, I don't get why we're here. With so many sites on our to-do review list, I'm really surprised we're taking the time to look at even more of these seemingly half-assed twink sites. If I hadn't seen it all before, I think I'd still be telling you that the content here feels un-inspired and even more so does the site design itself. No updates for months now will seal the deal; I won't be suggesting a join here to you now and likely not ever.
|
Click below to read one of our other editor reviews for this site.
Duke |
74.0 of 100 REVIEW
"Original solo & hardcore shoots with Brit guys although it's a small collection with choppy updates."
|
|
Maggie |
71.5 of 100 REVIEW
"With a small collection, no updates, and average quality, I'd pass."
|
|
Spencer |
71.0 of 100 REVIEW
"With no updates, so-so quality, and a small collection, it didn't quite work for me overall."
|
|
|
|
|
