OFFICIAL
69.0
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
13.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
10.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
50.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 08-24-06 |
|
1. Interesting concept for a site/unique content.
2. Regular updates.
1. Quality is average to at best.
2. Navigational & download options are lacking.
3. Price is high for what is offered.
"An interesting idea, but I wasn't impressed with what's inside." |
|
|
Well now this is an interesting concept for a site if I ever say one - Amateur Straight Guys Fondled offers over 50+ "young straight amateur guys" getting fondled while they sleep in more than 5,500+ exclusive images and 200+ videos...Or so they claim. Really what you'll get is something closer to 60+ video episodes featuring a new "amateur straight guy", and each comes with a couple of clips accompanied by the screen caps. Based on what I see in the member's area, the $26.45 monthly membership fee feels a little high, especially considering the amount of time between updates (8 days), but I do have to admit, this is an original idea for a site.
The Good:
- Exclusive amateur content, with over 60+ guys and unique videos from both a voyeurs perspective and someone who enjoys the fantasy of straight men being watched/fondled in their sleep. These are some hunky guys, too.
- Updates may not come all too often, but they are consistent at least (every 8 days). Each set comes with 3-6 video clips with a few different perspectives (shower, bed, chair, fondled, cum, etc.) and the set of screen caps for each.
The Bad:
- Site design is too simple, with all models/updates listed on a single page. There are not enough options for navigation, and especially not enough options for download.
- Quality is only about average, with the newest content using Windows Media Player and streaming at an average of 700k. Older content can stream as low as 200k, with the clips ranging from 30 seconds to 4 minutes.
- Overall I didn't find there to be any real personality here. I would be great if they offered a scene set-up or description with each episode; at the very least some model information.
The Conclusion:
Sure this is some unique content but the price of admission is way too high for what is offered. Older content quality is pretty bad and even the newest stuff is only average. You really have no options when it comes to navigation or download. After a while I'd tend to think that the content might get a little repetitive, too. Although an interesting idea for a site, I really think that StraightGuysFondled.com missed the mark when it came to execution.
|
