The Best Porn » Top Porn Sites » Sneaky Peek » Review By Vanessa
Last Update: 12-31-69
Jump To: Site Facts - Review

Sneaky Peek

Pay Site

This site features the results seen by those little hidden cams observing handsome guys getting naked.


Primary Niche: Gay Porn
Vanessa's review Vanessa's complete review and scoring breakdown of Sneaky Peek.

OFFICIAL
77.0
pretty good

Content

Quality : 17.0 / 20
Quantity : 13.0 / 15
Entertain : 14.0 / 15
Updates : 8.0 / 10
Exclusive : 5.0 / 05
Download : 2.5 / 05
sub-total : 59.5 / 70

Navigation
Easy : 6.5 / 10
Features : 2.5 / 05
Design : 2.5 / 05
sub-total : 11.5 / 20

Other
Originality : 3.0 / 05
Hard Facts : 3.0 / 05
sub-total : 6.0 / 10

Curve : 0.0 (+/-5)

Scoring Criteria
Sneaky Peek Review by Vanessa
Editor: Vanessa Initial Review: 04-10-07

PROS:

1. Large format videos.

2. Unique male voyeur content.


CONS:

1. Somewhat expensive join fee.

2. Site design and navigation definitely needs work.

3. User options are minimal.


 BOTTOM LINE:

"The content is unique but the poor organization & price tag are going to hurt some."
Just like the name suggests, SneakyPeek.net has perfected the art of voyeurism with "state of the art video surveillance technology". But these aren't scantly clad and naked girls they're watching; these are "naked males in lockerooms, dressing rooms, showers, bedrooms..." etc. In the member's area you'll find more than 13,700+ images and 207+ videos with updates coming in often it seems (although there is no clear way to tell for sure). Entrance into the site will cost you almost $30 bucks, which then recurs at about $25 bucks per month. This is rather high for an amateurly designed site, but the video quality is pretty good most of the time, and the content unique, so let's check it out.

The Good:

- There are quite a few voyeur sites out there, but no other's that I've seen that offer male content. I can imagine there's a large enough market for this, and is what makes Sneaky Peek unique. Content is not dated, but new material appears to be coming in often. You will find a nice mix of men dressing and undressing, weighing themselves, jerking off, showering and more. The content does not feel staged in slightest for many of the videos I checked out, and the men being peeked at are generally buff and handsome, coming from different playing fields, clothing shops, lockerooms, bedrooms, hostels etc. You will see some recurring names on the site, as well as girl-boy sex action (Daniel's Bedroom cam).

- Video streams are as high as 1600k, although the picture quality isn't the best I've seen for streams this high. They really do feel like voyeur cams with un-even focusing and a slightly blurry image.

- Many of the (newer) video clips are offered in slow motion so you really get to see these men rub their bodies in the shower, washing their genitals, getting undressed, and more. Some videos stills are also offered throughout.

The Bad:

- Even though the bitrate is high, the quality here is really not the best. Picture size is large, but they videos are often blurry and choppy. This does contribute to the voyeur feel, however.

- Site design is completely amateur, grouping the content into gallery numbers and offering no options when it comes to users, browse, or navigation features. There are also no date stamps on the content and the lack of an update page makes it hard to tell just how often new material is being added.

- Sneaky Peek is rather expensive! Especially the initial price, thankfully the recurring amount is not as high.

The Conclusion:

I found Sneaky Peeks to be an enjoyable site with unique content and some nicer quality videos than what you'd get/expect from many other voyeur sites. The problem is the execution of design along with the rather high price tag to match. The videos don't stream right away either, and end up taking some time to download. I wish they'd do away with the higher join fee and just stick with the recurring price, which might be worth it to some of you looking for male voyeur content.


Enter Sneaky Peek

other editor reviews  
Click below to read one of our other editor reviews for this site.

Sneaky Peek Review by Spencer Spencer 74.0 of 100  REVIEW

"The content here is decent, though the site and specifics are lacking a little."
Sneaky Peek Review by Maggie Maggie 73.5 of 100  REVIEW

"Good looking voyeur content, but I wish the site itself was more user-friendly."
Sneaky Peek Review by Duke Duke 72.0 of 100  REVIEW

"All guy voyeur content but the site could use improvements to the design & updates."

Back to: Sneaky Peek Profile  |  The Best Porn Home