OFFICIAL
67.2
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
2.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
48.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
6.7 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
6.7 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 09-04-06 |
|
1. Lots of videos up (though they're short).
2. Content can look okay once in a while.
1. No updates in a long time.
2. Browsing the site is a bit of a pain.
3. Quality can be bad.
4. I don't believe all of this stuff is authentic voyeur material.
"A collection that's just barely okay for now, but the lack of updates really kills the deal." |
|
|
I'm not sure where Sifrand is, or if it's a place even, but the Sifrand Voyeur Club is all about letting you check out Russian girls voyeur-style. The first tour page is full of text which wasn't too helpful, but there are some preview images to check out if you hit the right link up top. Their preview page is a little worrisome because they aren't showing any updates past January of 2006, which is about eight months ago at this point. A membership will set you back $25 a month, so hopefully they can deliver some good stuff for that price inside.
The goods:
- Lots of videos up (though they're short). There's a good amount to see here already thankfully, so not all is lost here. There are almost 1,000 video scenes up, though they're only around a minute long usually. At least you get something to see for your money from the get go.
- Once in a while the content looks decent. Unfortunately it's not the norm here, but some of the videos and stuff can look nice once in a while. I understand that voyeur content sometimes results in hidden cameras and low-light situations, but you'd at least want some nice encoding rates and stuff to make up for it.
The bads:
- No updates in a long time. They stopped about eight months ago in January, 2006, and haven't started back up since it seems. Regular updates would really help their score out, as right now it's not too enticing to stick around very long.
- Browsing around is a bit of a pain. They break things up into categories nicely, but overall the site structure and layout just isn't very impressive. They could definitely use a redesign and the addition of some graphics here to start. On top of that, a simpler navigation would definitely be helpful.
- Quality can be bad for sure. Some sets just don't look good at all, which is a bit of the nature of voyeur material I guess. As I mentioned before, if we can't get brightly-lit scenes and perfect camera shots, at least help us out with good encoding rates and such.
- This stuff can't all be authentic voyeur. Some of these "hidden" cameras look awesome, are able to zoom, and have the girls just doing a little too much playing it up for my liking. Beware that not all this stuff is real if you ask me.
Conclusion:
They have a decent-sized collection up, and there's some interesting niche material I guess. On the downside, there are no updates coming, the quality varies a lot, and the site itself needs some work. To sum it up I guess, as I look at the top of the site, there's but one lone person viewing their site right now (me), which may speak volumes. It's okay, but it's just not really good to me.
|
