OFFICIAL
67.2
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
10.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
4.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
47.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
6.7 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
6.7 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Maggie |
Initial Review: 09-02-06 |
|
1. Possibly some original content.
2. Nice sized video collection.
1. No updates in over 8 months.
2. Mostly poor quality content.
3. Plain design.
"I'd pass on this average voyeur collection that doesn't even update." |
|
|
Sirfrand Voyeur Club offers you the "unique opportunity to feast your eyes upon Russian women and girls." Their "voyeur masters" capture girls in hot upskirt shots, locker rooms and dressing rooms, at the beach, and just about anywhere else. It's not all about hidden cameras, though. Some of these women do want to be caught on camera in their most intimate moments. The other half of the site is dedicated to user contributed photos of real amateur women. The tour is simple but offers enough of a preview to give you a good idea of what to expect inside.
The Goods -
The site seems to offer some original content. While it's not explicitly stated as such, I assume that many of the user contributions are original and that you probably won't see them in too many other places. It sounds like they also shoot their own voyeur content but I can't be certain.
They've got a nice sized collection of video clips. You'll find nearly a thousand currently online. While they are usually pretty short at around a minute each, there are enough of them to keep you busy for a while.
The Bads -
Content quality varies but most of the time it's pretty bad. We're dealing with two niches notorious for bad quality content, voyeur and user-submissions. Poorly lit and grainy are two words that come to mind when viewing many of these sets, although I will say that most of the photos are actually good sized.
The site hasn't been updated in a long time. It looks like the last time anything new was added was January 24, 2006. That was over eight months ago. Even before that updates were unreliable. I wouldn't count on anything new being added to this collection.
The site design is really plain. They seem to have some sort of basic template or program that "organizes" their files. What we end up getting is a very generic, minimally helpful set-up. They've got some categories for the scenes (bikini, locker room, down blouse, etc) which help but more browse features are badly needed. As I said, it all feels very generic. There are no scene descriptions or any kind of user community features (something typically seen on a site with user-submissions) to give the site any personality.
Conclusion -
Sirfrand Voyeur Club is a miss for me. There's just no area that they're particularly strong in. The site hasn't been updated in ages, it's not very user-friendly, quality is poor, and there's no personality. Considering all this, and that I can't be sure it's original content, I just can't justify the price of $25 a month. At least they offer a trial, if you really want to give it a look, but there are better alternatives out there.
|
