|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
3.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
49.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
6.8 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
6.8 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 09-05-06 |
|
1. Mix of vouyeur/amateur niches.
2. Decent number of videos.
1. Navigation needs improving.
2. Very short videos.
3. No longer updating.
"A pretty good mix of voyeur & amateur niches but updates aren't coming any more." |
|
|
Sifrand Voyeur Club has content that falls into a handful of niches including voyeur, upskirt, public nudity, and amateur. There's actually more micro-niches than that but you get the idea. The guest tour has quite a write-up summary of the site including the picture and video count. There's also some preview pages that give accurate samples of the member content.
The Goods:
- Mix of Voyeur/Amateur Micro-niches. I see this as strength mostly because it allows for some variety in the collection. Some of the content sections are things like braless, down blouse, public sex, shower, and toilet. The site is geared towards surfers looking for this mix and not just traditional hidden-cam style voyeur action.
- Decent Number of Videos. Although most of the video clips are quite short there are over 900 which is pretty good for a voyeur site like this. They have a Divx and Real player clips plus they post the time and file size.
The Bads:
- Navigation Needs Improving. The main thing would be to have a section for just the videos. Without that it's more difficult than it should be to find videos since you need to scroll through pages with both photo galleries and videos on them.
- Very Short Videos. Many are around or shorter than 1 minute. Some do go up to a few minutes in length but those are balanced by the clips that are only 5-20 seconds long.
- No Longer Updating. On the updates page the most recent addition posted is back on January 2006. That's clearly a problem.
Conclusion:
Clearly what Sifrand most needs right now is some attention from the webmaster. The content base is okay but updates need to be kick-started again and a better layout should be implemented. Not only does the lack of updates hurt the update rating but the value too.
|
