|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
53.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
|
1. Good amount of content.
2. Gets into niches.
3. Some pictures are pretty large.
1. Less interaction than I wanted.
2. Design/navigation need to be updated.
3. Video quality needs to be improved.
4. Not growing as fast as you'd think.
"An ok site that goes through the motions, but I don't feel the love from the site overall." |
|
|
Where the hell do all these horny women come from who open up their own amateur sites? Today's site is no exception, with our star being Sierra. The site apparently follows her and her dark desires, which should be taken quite literally. Sierra evidently loves black cock, and who doesn't right? Not only does she love block cock, but she loves black cocks, as in multiple men at one time.
Checking out the tour, I can tell you with 99% certainty that she didn't design it. Honestly with a pro-designed tour it gives the site a much different feel. Just based on the tour, it makes me feel as though we're not going to get to know Sierra as much as I'd like, and that the site is based on a random content model or something. I understand the need to have a nice-looking site, but I'd almost rather see a site that she designed herself.
The member's area changes that a little bit. The header is still the large graphic from the tour, but I think she does the rest of it. It's actually a little confusing to know where to go first. There's no standard "photos" link or anything. Instead, she offers up her galleries in different sections depending what you want to see. The main photo sections are interracial, smoking, and stockings and heels.
The photos vary a lot, and overall were about what you'd expect. The quality isn't great, but there's lots of hardcore action to make up for it. Most of the time the lighting just isn't that good, which is what hurts the photos the most for me. The range in size a lot, from 640x480 to 1280x960! It's nice to see her offer the larger pictures, which were mostly found on the first page of the interracial section, instead of staying stagnant over time. Browsing around the galleries was a little annoying as well, as the only links she provides are a "next" and "previous" page without any idea how many pages there are.
Sierra's video clips are divided into a few sections as well. There's a section for "large clips" which only has five available right now. Her dialup video section has over 100 video clips, while her high-speed section has just over 25. There's all sorts of video types ranging from Windows Media, to MPG, and AVI (non-DivX I'm pretty sure). All of them ranged from average to below-average quality. I think the only difference between the dialup and broadband clips is the length, since specs looked similar all around. Most videos were 320x240, and encoding (for WMV) ranged from 150-500kbps, although they didn't look fantastic. Other formats looked similar, although they all varied a bit from one to the next.
For cams, she's on Amateur Cam House which gets you into their site. She also has a store, a pretty inactive chat board, and galleries from other amateurs. Updates are sporadic but large, and it usually averages out to a few new sets each week which is better than most amateur's sites. Membership costs a standard $20 a month.
Overall, the site does things right, but I wasn't overly excited while browsing around. They have all the right content up and stuff, but I don't see a lot of personality coming through (except for her love of the black men of course). If you're into amateurs, especially those that love interracial gangbangs, it may work for you. For amateur lovers, unless you fall in love with Sierra herself, I'd call it just ok.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 09-08-06 |
Much seems to be the same around these parts as it was last time we were here. Updates continue to come pretty regularly, but overall the site isn't really that much bigger than it was last time we were here. The interaction is still lacking, and the quality hasn't really improved much either. While not much has changed around here, I have a feeling the score will drop a bit just due to the increased competition out there these days. You really have to keep the quality improving, and of course the interaction coming on an amateur site like this to keep ahead of the curve.
Score decreased from 73.9 to 73.0.
|
