|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 07-12-06 |
|
1. Content is good quality.
2. Exclusive amateur content.
1. Site design is too plain/not enough options.
2. No download options/browsing features.
3. Too expensive for what it offers.
4. No model index.
"Exclusive, good quality content but that price tag is a deal breaker for me." |
|
|
These aren't your average show girls; these are Show Teens, "innocent teenies turned into filthy cumbags!" Which, incidentally, is just how I like them :) Still somewhat of a new site, so far a $29.95 monthly membership here only gives you access to close to 3,000+ images and 16+ videos, but the content is exclusive and updates appear to be coming in, although sometimes sporadic seeming. The average is about 5-10+ days in between depending on the time of the month. I think it's clear that space in between updates, an over-simplified site design, and somewhat high price tag is what will end up holding this site back but there's no doubt teen suck & fuck content is always fun to check out. And interesting enough, a new update was added in the time that I was visiting the site, that one being only 3 days between. But any way, let's get to it.
The Good:
- I'll start with quality, since offering it is always a good thing! The images here are nice quality even though they're amateur in style. You can tell professional equipment was used and pixel dimensions go up to 800x1200; all great offerings from an exclusive content site. Video quality too is generally nice with streams as high as 900k.
- Overall the content was entertaining to watch. It's your basic suck and fuck content, although I can't honestly say that all the girls here look like your innocent teenager but they are rather cute. There was lots of masturbation content here, I found, maybe a couple of group sex scenes, some outdoors content, you get the idea. If things were organized better I bet I'd be a lot more excited by the content, however.
The Bad:
- For the amount of content that the site offers, you have to admit $29.95 is too expensive. The overall quality here looks to be pretty good but the site is really missing all the bells and whistles to really make it a quality site.
- Site design is way too simple and offers nothing in the way of options, and you all know we love options here at The Best Porn! Content is simply listed in chronological order and although on the actual image/video set pages they give you the option to filter to one or the other (video or image content), that's about it; no model index, no categories, no searches, etc.
- Updates appear to be sporadic, but they’re really not. What you can expect is 5 updates per month and if you happen find that little link that says "coming soon" on the site, you'll see that it jumps you straight to January of 2007 updates! It would appear that this site is essentially running itself! Well hell, at least you know you're good for a while with this one!
- There are no real download options for any of the content. Videos are broken down into shorter clips and I'd at least like to see a full-length option, not to mention some higher quality streams, zip files, etc.
The Conclusion:
For a site that is so damn simple, I really went to town on it! I'm not sure if that's good or bad but I can tell you that I wouldn't spend almost $30 bucks a month for what they've got going here now. Although exclusive, it's certainly not ground-breaking and original. There are tons of sites just like this out there. It's too bad, too because these are some very fresh amateur faces and the quality it actually quite good overall. They simply didn't do the best job at showcasing it and making it an affordable value for users.
|
