OFFICIAL
75.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
11.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 09-12-06 |
|
1. Archives going back for years.
2. Only smoking focused content.
3. Good amt of galleries & videos.
1. Poor photo gallery navigation.
2. Older videos are lower quality.
3. No vid preview pics or descriptions.
"This smoking content should be appealing to fans of that fetish even though the site could use some design work." |
|
|
Sexy Smokers is one of those sites where TBP's site facts and a review can really come in handy. The guest tour is an old school design that doesn't do all that great of a job of showing what the member's area is like (plus the pop-ups are annoying). That being said the simple two-word title here is spot on accurate about what kind of action is featured in the member's area. The focus is very much on the performers smoking whether it's simply a woman smoking clothed or in solo masturbation/hardcore action (the content is a mix of the two).
The Goods:
- Good Amount of Galleries & Videos. There are a lot of photo galleries and judging by the videos section which is laid out chronologically they have a database of content dating back to 1999. There are about twice as many galleries as videos but there are hundreds of both making the quantity Sexy Smoker's biggest strength.
- Only Focused Smoking Content. Neither the pictures nor videos waiver at all from showing girls smoking in one way or another. Sometimes fetish sites can wander off their micro-niche so it's good to see Sexy Smokers doesn't do that.
- Years Worth of Archives. This mostly comes from the video section with the month/year organization. It shows they've been at this for a long time with a track record of growing the site.
The Bads:
- No Video Preview Pics or Descriptions. All that is provided is a girl's name, a hardcore rating (PG or R/X) and video length. Some sort of preview pic is needed so members aren't forced to stream or download blind.
- Older Videos Are Lower Quality. The newer videos have a couple format choices while the older material can be quite grainy and is only in a single format. The drop off is very noticeable.
- Poor Photo Gallery Navigation. They've got the galleries organized by model name again without any thumbnail preview of the girl. With the number of galleries varying so much per girl the pages look disorganized and require a lot of scrolling.
Conclusion:
Based on their content collection Sexy Smokers is meant for those smoking fans that are looking for girls sitting, smoking, and looking sexy. Considering the amount of content they've compiled I really think an improved member's area (and guest tour) would go a long way to making the site more user-friendly. I know I'd like it more.
|
