New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank.
Review Published: Sep 24th, 2006
Duke
75.0
"This smoking content should be appealing to fans of that fetish even though the site could use some design work."
(+) Archives going back for years.
(+) Only smoking focused content.
(+) Good amt of galleries & videos.
(-) Poor photo gallery navigation.
(-) Older videos are lower quality.
(-) No vid preview pics or descriptions.
"The site itself is lacking, but their true devotion to smoking content shines through."
(+) They know a ton about the smoking niche.
(+) Lots of content up.
(+) Updates are coming pretty regularly,
(-) Some areas lacking (on purpose).
(-) Navigation is a big pain.
(-) Quality isn't quite what we're used to.
"A dedicated smoking site, but a little too expensive & in need of a few upgrades."
(+) Nice size archive of content.
(+) Real smoking fetish content.
(+) Some good quality image content.
(+) Consistent updates.
(-) Site design and navigation needs work (all text links).
(-) Quality ranges and can be poor.
(-) No full-length streams/downloads.
(-) Somewhat expensive.
DISCLAIMER: ALL MODELS APPEARING ON THIS WEBSITE ARE 18 YEARS OR OLDER.
Protecting Minors
We are strong supporters of RTA and ICRA, two of the most recognized self labeling organizations. Our site is properly labeled to assist in the protection of minors accessing inappopriate content. For information about filtering tools, check this site.
To report child pornography, go directly to ASACP! We're proud to be a corporate sponsor.
Have concerns or questions about porn addiction? We recommend this helpful resource.
