|
Content
|
| Quality : |
20.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
54.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
11.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Awesome video quality.
2. Nice boob content.
1. Site design & navigation needs work.
2. No model/site information.
3. No clear update schedule/lack of updates.
"Only Breast has a good concept but the execution could use some work." |
|
|
Not too long ago I got an email from one of our users asking if I knew of any young female sites focusing on chick with bigger, natural breasts. At the time it had been a while since I had seen anything other than gay sites (been doing a lot of those lately), porn stars with big ol' fake tits and individual amateurs. Well here we are, OnlyBreast.com claims to be "your place for beautiful women and high quality content". Both the models you know and love as well as "hot new teens" are offered here but except for the obvious title of the site, I am a little curious as to why there is not more focus on the female titties in the sites' tour. So no, this is not a big boob lovers site, but it does focus on young, fresh new faces and all natural bodies, ranging from girls with great big breasts to little perky ones and all others in between. To date there are 104+ models on the site in around 10,000+ images and 40+ short video clips for $23.95 per month.
First negative that I see so far is the fact that upon joining the site, you must first pay for the $9.95, 10 day trial before you actually start with the $23.95 monthly fee. I guess maybe it's just me who's not big on trials unless you're one who can pack it all in in 3-10 days and then get our before you get billed, but I don't like the fact that they're essentially squeezing up to $33.90 out of you just to join the site for the month. The second negative so far is that the site is slow to load, which can get rather annoying. When it comes to the members area itself I was a little disappointed to find a very simple homepage offering a text link to the pictures and 5+ movie index's. The picture index lists 20-30+ girls per page in no particular order that I can see; alphabetizing them would help a ton. Some girls offer pics and videos while others only offer pics. The images themselves range in quality and image size is roughly average at 800x600 pixels. A lot of these are Russian girls and most of them are very cute. It's hard to say about the exclusivity of the content here (although I do think the content here is exclusive), but it's more because a lot of the content feels rather generic; the kind of softcore content you can find pretty much anywhere, although, there is a nice focus on the girls' tits (and ass too) which is what I would hope to see from a site called OnlyBreast.com.
Only breast offers 5+ movie index's each with about 9, 2-3 minute videos. Therefore the clips are short and sweet, offing light masturbation, boob play, stream scenes, solo nudity and more. A lot of times they start with the young girl lying on the best, in a sleep-like state before she begins to stir, undress herself and play with her tits/pussy. The videos stream at roughly 700k but the quality is mostly just average. The best part about the videos is that you really get to see just how hot these chicks are, I only wish they were longer and offered even more masturbation/orgasms, toys etc. I was put off in general by the sites' lack of smooth navigation and design, as well as by the endless banner ads and up sells. In the end OnlyBreast.com turns out to be a over priced site with some good content but nothing to write home about. While there is a lot of emphasis on breasts and boob play, there aren't a lot of girls here with larger than average size breasts and the size and quality of the images could stand to be improved, the videos could be longer and the site design needs to be completely re-thought in order to make it worth the $23.95 monthly fee.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 10-13-06 |
Wow! We might as well completely scratch our old review of OnlyBreast.com and start all over! In any case, it looks like that's what they've decided to do. Gone are the 100+ models, 10,000 images and 40 short video clips, and in are a grand total of 13+ super high quality videos featuring really hot chicks with great breasts! These are all softcore solo shoots but let me tell you, they stream in 2 speeds: 2000k and 5000k+! All 13+ videos are broken down into shorter clips to make streaming/downloading easier, but I would have really loved to have had access to a full-length file as well.
Right now there's definitely not enough content here yet, especially to justify the $23.95 monthly price. The super high quality videos are great, but there's nothing else here and in the future I'd imagine they'll have to add more browse/design features to spruce things up a bit. IT also doesn't look like anything new has been added for almost 2 months now (although all 13+ videos were added at once back in August). Overall I don't see my score changing much, but man I hope they continue forward with this idea for the future of the site, and they better get to it!
Score increased from 67.2 to 72.3.
| 2nd Follow-Up Review |
Review: 06-04-07 |
One of the previous negatives I had about Only Breast was the lack of a clear update schedule, and now, close to 8 months later, it's starting to become clearer - OnlyBreast.com simply doesn't update very often at all. In fact, I don't think there's been a single update for almost 4+ months now. With that being said, this is still some of the nicest quality video out there, and boob fans are sure to appreciate that. However, also missing is that extra dose of site personality (i.e. model & scene information). Overall, quality aside, I'm not impressed and hope to see some bigger changes and more consistent updates here next time around.
Score decreased from 72.3 to 71.0.
|
