OFFICIAL
76.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
14.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
|
1. Inexpensive.
2. Large archive of content.
3. Multi-site access.
1. No model information or bios.
2. Overall general content (not always teen specific).
3. Non-exclusive content.
4. Quality could be better.
"They may not all be 19 but these girls sure do get nasty." |
|
|
Just a year over the legal age limit, the girls at Nasty19.com are still young enough to be considered barely legal. There is a lot of content to check out here (89,100+ images, 119+ videos), and that's not even including the other 10+ sites content that you get access to with your super low $9.95 monthly membership. Everything sounds great so far, right? Indeed, but that's not to say that Nasty19 is perfect. In fact, this is just one of the 10+ sites that you get access to with your membership that I have mixed feelings about.
The Good:
- Multi-site access and a super low reduced monthly price is a major plus! Not to mention that there's a nice sized archive of content here on its own and updates look to come in consistently and often, although it's hard to say for sure. However, the videos are lengthy (10-30 minutes) and image sets offer more than 100 pics each most of the time. Plus there's a lot of bonus content, too.
- To be perfectly honest, not all of these girls really look 19, but there is a nice collection of cute/hot amateurs partaking in super hardcore sex.
- Most videos are offered high or low resolution in parts along with an option for a full-length download. Higher res ones are MPEG files that look pretty nice most of the time, and the low res are WMV. Not my preference for high res, but the quality is not bad. Images are offered in 2 sizes too, and even though their largest image size doesn't quite make our cut as "high resolution", the quality of them is pretty good nonetheless.
The Bad:
- The content here looks to be a little random at times, and like I stated previously, some of the girls look young and many don't. But hey, they're still having fun, right? The point is that not everything here is exclusive, and thus, doesn't flow together as well as other sites' content might.
- Design is very generic and even though they offer full-length video downloads, I need higher quality options (WMV preferably)! Right now the content quality is only just a smidgen above average compared to other paysites these days. Sometimes the design here isn't consistent, too.
- Lots to improve on; from quality to design/navigation options, etc.
The Conclusion:
In the end I have to be completely honest when I say that I'm getting just a little sick of these overly "general" suck & fuck sites claiming to be "teen sites", and Nasty19.com is a shining example. Granted, there are quite a few young cuties to check out, and the price tag is set at a very reasonable $9.95 per month (for our users), but sometimes I just can't help but be put-off by the lack of model information and overall consistency. I will say, though, that this is a great deal for those of you seeking out lots of general porno content at a decent price, as your membership here also gives access to another 10+ sites on top of the already large archive of pics and videos found on this site alone.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 01-07-09 |
Last time we looked at Nasty 19s member’s area was about a year and a half ago, and since then the total number of sites you gain access to with a membership has increased to 11+. Although, by my number counts, there doesn't seem to be as much growth as you would think in a 1.5 year timeline even though they promise daily updates. Everything else seems the same. In fact, it doesn't look like much at all has changed since our last visit, but at least that means the reduced price tag is still in place. In my opinion, however, I'm not sure the lack of quality & design would make this teen site anywhere near the top on my list. Hopefully next time we'll see a few more changes in a positive direction.
Score decreased from 77.5 to 76.0.
|
