|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 05-12-08 |
|
1. Unique content.
2. Model index.
3. Usually weekly updates.
1. Quality is average to below.
2. Videos are broken down into too many clips.
3. No model or content information.
4. Poor site design.
"Unique content & lots of it, but the site itself could use some work." |
|
|
Muscle Hunks features men with "massive muscle" that come packin' the heat! Brought to you by Dynamite Studios, the member's area boasts more than 24,000+ images and 555+ videos with premiere models such as Amerigo Jackson, Steve English, Paul strong, Christian Engel, Rex Blackstone and more. These are some very serious competition body builders in solo action content. A membership will run you close to $30 bucks per month and new content is usually added weekly, with some hiccups here and there.
The Good:
- Unique content of real body builders in solo situations and a lot of it. There is some nudity and masturbation, plus tons of muscle flexing, tight shorts and body oils; basically a lot of pumping and posing. I can't tell if all of the content is exclusive to the site, but I do know that some of the models are exclusive while others are not.
- Some newer videos have Flash viewing options that allow easy streaming.
- Some video clips are offered in WMV format up to 1400k-1900k. The quality is okay, watchable, and videos can be entertaining.
The Bad:
- Poor site design set-up doesn't properly showcase the models or their content. They do list models in alphabetical order, but content viewing and options aren't consistent. Also, they don't offer any sort of model bios or content information.
- Videos are broken down into too many clips without any screen shots or information. Images also don't offer any information and viewing/download options are non-existent.
- Quality is average and below! Image sizes are incredibly small, especially for this day and age. Likewise, the video content quality just doesn't match up. Even the few offerings that they do have with streams up to 1400k-1900k are just so-so.
The Conclusion:
I haven't seen very many Muscle Hunk sites around, so I was excited to get inside the members area here. Unfortunately I'd be lying if I said I wasn't disappointed by what was offered once inside. The site design is problematic, and doesn't allow an easy flow for browsing the content. Images are way too small and even the newer, higher bitrate streaming options had video picture qualities that were below average. I get that this is unique content, but for almost $30 bucks per month I was expecting more.
|
