|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
59.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Updates come quite often.
2. Good-looking pictures.
3. Decent-sized collection.
1. Could use more options all around.
2. Video quality could be a little better.
"Quite a nice collection of photos here, and I'd love to see the quality expanded even more." |
|
|
Don't ask me what ModFX stands for, but I know what models are. Check out their tour and you'll know as well since they have some pretty hot chicks listed there. There's a lot of competition in this genre with many sites sharing models, and of course there's not a ton you can do that's very unique with such a softcore site. This usually comes down to having a good site (browsing, options, search, features) with high-quality content. $20 a month is a great place to start here for sure.
The goods:
- Good-looking pictures. Of course they have to, but these fit the bill. They aren't huge, just 1000x650 or so, but the color, lighting, and image quality is pretty decent all around. There's some slight airbrushing I believe, but it's very minimal and doesn't really get in the way ever.
- Updates come quite often. The updates page is a little confusing since they'll list a new video in their free area as an update (or a webcam chat), but still something new seems to be put up every few days which keeps the site growing of course. At least there's usually something going on here one way or another.
- Site looks nice. If you're not on a page with a bunch of hot women on it, it has a bit of a corporate feel to it in my opinion, but the design is clean and simple which is fine by me. Once some pictures are on a page, they contain some nice bright contrast which really pops out at you and makes you want to see more of her.
The bads:
- Pictures could be larger. For a high-quality photography site, I always look for as big of pictures as possible. They could even offer multiple sizes to suit everyone, but I think they're a little on the small side. When you only offer semi-nude hot chicks, I think you have to maximize everything else to wow people.
- May be too soft at times. This shouldn't even need to be mentioned since that's the type of site it is, but more often than not people do complain to us about no hardcore on one site or another. There are some very, very hot chicks here in great sexy poses, but you won't see any anal gangbangs - stay away if that's what you need.
- Video quality is a little better than last time I think, but if the name of the game is quality I could still use something better. 640x480 and 850kbps is closer to the average these days instead of stand-out quality, but it's not awful either.
Conclusion:
Though this will only cater to those who enjoy sexy women and content, I think their site is decent. There's always a few changes I'd make here and there, but overall I like what they offer and the price is decent too. Definitely worth a look if you think you might be interested.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 11-08-06 |
The main improvements around here are the larger content counts of course, as well as some larger pictures than we were seeing last time around. The rest remains much the same from the price to the lagging video quality, as well as a site that could use a few touch ups here and there. The growth was expected while the larger pics were a nice surprise. Bump that video quality up and we'll be doing pretty well around here content-wise.
Score decreased from 82.2 to 80.5.
|