OFFICIAL
76.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
14.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
9.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
8.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 10-16-07 |
|
1. Unique niche.
2. Updates come daily.
1. Lots of non-nude content (and fakes).
2. Videos not a big priority.
3. Site was a little slow responding.
"I like the site enough, but the content just wasn't quite what I was expecting here." |
|
|
It wasn't just a couple weeks ago that I saw my first male celebrity site, which I thought was a good idea at the time since I hadn't seen one before. Today we're looking at another, called Male Celebrities (genius!), that seems to focus on more mainstream celebs which is a good thing. Right on their homepage they're offering up people I've heard of, and I don't remember a whole lot sometimes. Membership is $30 a month, and right on par with what I'd expect to see for this type of site.
The goods:
- Unique niche. I assume there's a decent-sized group out there that would love a site like this. I know I love seeing famous women naked, so the opposite has to be true as well for those into guys.
- Updates come daily. It's usually at least a couple pictures, plus a few "features" added daily, which keeps things fresh.
The bads:
- Lots of non-nude (or even fake) content. Most every guy I clicked on, even in their top 10 and such, had mostly non-nude content. You can choose to see only the nude/semi-nude material, but at best it's usually a topless guy. Of course there are those who are nude, but they were harder to find than I would have liked. The same goes for the fake nudes, which don't do anybody much good if you ask me.
- Videos not a big priority. Most guys have no videos available, though there is a link to view only guys with videos at least. They're the best content in my book, and it's too bad that it's not a larger portion of the site here.
- Site was a little slow responding at times. Pages were blank for several seconds before anything began to load, which got annoying after a while. It could be a temporary thing, but either way it distracted me from the site a bit.
Conclusion:
The idea is good, but maybe there just isn't enough of this type of content to do well. The lack of adult-related content was disappointing, even if it was just someone's ass or something. The site is done well enough, but if the content doesn't work for you, then when good does it do? This could be more entertaining for some, but for me, it felt like content I could maybe find elsewhere if I wanted it bad enough.
|
