OFFICIAL
75.5
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
57.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
11.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 01-28-09 |
|
1. Lots of content up.
2. Updates regularly.
1. Navigation is a huge pain.
2. Site is plain overall.
3. Quality needs work.
"The site itself is horrible, but the content is unique and could be fun." |
|
|
Today we have a site with several names up for review. The actual domain is called Mack City, while I've seen it referred to as anything from FatMack XXXL, to Black Ghetto Pussy, and more. It's a pretty large site that focuses on very raw amateur black content, and other various gangster girls thrown in as well. The site is setup like a big journal of girls this guy has met and fucked, which is different from what we're used to seeing; it takes a little getting used to. Membership is $30 a month, which is a touch high for what I'd be looking for.
The goods:
- Lots of content up. There are quite a few little videos up here, over 500 to be exact. Granted some of these aren't full-feature films, but there's still a lot to see in the end.
- Updates regularly. He puts the date on each journal entry, and you can see that updates come quite regularly here. It varies from day to day, but generally updates come at least once a week (sometimes a little slower), and sometimes a lot quicker such as every few days. It just depends on his schedule I guess.
The bads:
- Navigation is a huge pain. The journal setup is unique, but that doesn't mean it works better (though I do like all the info he provides). As far as navigation, it's a huge pain in the ass honestly. There are about 40 pages worth of journals, and then the galleries and videos are sprinkled around these pages. There are no categories, no search, and not even separate photo and video sections. There is a model's index somehow, but the pics are so small that you can't really use it to find hot chicks.
- Site is plain overall. The few graphics they have are cheesy old-school ones from the year 2000 (an animated gif of fire for instance), and the rest is all very plain text-only stuff. As I mentioned earlier, the navigation options are quite plain, and that continues throughout the video options, graphic design, layout, and more.
- Quality needs work. Even the newest content doesn't look that great, and the quality needs a definite boost here.
Conclusion:
Though there's a lot to see and it's unique, this site is a tough one for me overall. The layout and design are pretty bad, the quality isn't good, and even some of the galleries or scenes are on the small side. It is unique, and the scenes can be fun with how real they are, but it'd be so much more fun if the site was redesigned to make it easier to get around, and better looking.
|
