OFFICIAL
65.0
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
10.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
10.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
48.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
1.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
1.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
9.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Maggie |
Initial Review: 05-23-05 |
|
1. Consistant updates.
2. Exclusive content.
1. Quality could be better.
2. Needs better browse features.
3. Never shows her face.
4. Design needs work.
"A unique niche, but the quality and hidden face are turn offs." |
|
|
Linda Might is the website of the Queen of Clits, Linda, who sports a 3 inch long clit. When she gets excited her clit grows from 1 inch to over 3 which she says earns her the title of "Biggest Clit on The Net." I've got to admit, I have never seen any others even close to as large as Linda's love button. It's huge! It's almost like a small penis when it's fully aroused! Pretty kinky! Unfortunently, you better be content to see lots of her clit because you're not gonna see much else of Linda. She doesn't show her face at all. You might catch a smidge of a profile shot but that's pretty rare and she wears a wig to further hide her identity. I can certainly understand wanting privacy but I personally could not join a site where I didn't see the person's face. There's so much more to sex beyond nice racks and big clits and I think a lot of personality and intimacy is lost when the face is not revealed.
My disappointment with the site continued as I browsed the member's area. The design is pretty darn bad. It's almost entirely text which, while clean, isn't really very attractive. Second, the organization of the galleries was a little too simple for me. The 205 galleries are ordered by date in long columns with only a set of numbers to go by. There is no title or description, let alone a preview thumbnail! It may be technically clean but it's just not very surfer friendly. The one good thing about this setup is that it's easy to see when updates take place. Linda adds a new gallery or video once a week which is a fine schedule for an amateur site. For some reason her latest galleries aren't available in her section of galleries but only on the updates page.
I wish I could say the quality of the content won me over but it didn't. The pictures are small at 640x480 and they're your run of the mill amateur-looking quality. The videos were better but many suffered from their own pixelation issues. Thankfully she's moving in the right direction with video quality. Her newest movies are mpegs that play at 1800k. They look much better. It would be nice to see this kind of improvement in her photo galleries, as well.
Considering that Linda doesn't reveal her face and that the focus of the site is her clit, it should come as no surprise that the majority of the action features crotch shots. Fans of closeups will be satisfied with gallery after gallery of Linda using toys and fucking her husband, all while exposing her gifted pussy. It's a very hardcore site that even dabbles in bdsm. I think the true draw of this site to many people is simply the shock value. I've never seen anything like Linda's clit and it's not even something someone can fake. That's what makes the site interesting.
I know I was pretty harsh on this site but I just couldn't get into it with the poor design and photo quality and not being able to see Linda's face. She has such a great natural asset for the porn world but it's just not being presented to its true potential. I have no complaints about the size of the collection or frequency of updates and the price is reasonable at $22 a month. However, for me the negatives outweigh the positives here. She does have an unusual and entertaining theme to the site, but the package just needs more work at this time.
|
