|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
14.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
59.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
8.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 01-17-08 |
|
1. Interesting blend of hardcore/fetish sites.
2. Some unique original extreme content.
1. Avg navigation, lots of pwd entering.
2. Inconsistent content style/format/quality.
"A network where fetish/extreme content is the star but the delve into a few mainstream niches too." |
|
|
KPackage is a network that's a bit different than the standard video/reality network out there. The major difference is KPackage's focus on including fetish sites including some extreme content. The KScans.com site is the kind of the flagship site and there are sister sites to accompany that called Kfisting.com, Kpeeing.com, Kporns.com, Kerotic.com and Klivecam.com. The network also goes beyond those "K" sites into many different niches and fetishes.
The Goods:
- Interesting Blend of Hardcore/Fetish Sites. The majority of the sites can be classified as fetishes and they cover areas like insertions, fisting, peeing, bondage/BDSM, foot fetish, spanking, enemas, and panty licking. The more "normal" niches include sexy nudes, hardcore, Euro, blowjob/cumshot, handjobs, and Japanese/Asian. What they've put together makes for a pretty interesting mixed bag of content with lots of exclusive stuff.
- Some Unique Original Extreme Content. The Kscans.com was the start of this for this company and for the most part the extreme fetish content is the main thrust of the KPackage network. The target audience is probably someone who likes the freakier style sites rather than the more general niches.
The Bads:
- Average Navigation, Lots of Pwd Entering. It seems like these guys have only done half the work of building a network hub. The member’s page does have a layout of links to the sites which are numbered. The navigation isn't smooth though. Each site requires password entry and there isn't any categorization of the sites. They haven’t built a cohesive "network" setup yet; instead it feels more like a loose collection of individual sites.
- Inconsistent Content Style/Format/Quality. This is somewhat similar to the network navigation issue. The included sites differ very much in terms of layout, types of content, quality of content, and the format. Sometimes full-movie files are available and other times it's only clips. Quality varies from high quality pics/vids to average and grainy stuff.
Conclusion:
K package is a network that's not like any other that I've reviewed. Its appeal lies mostly with those looking for kinky fetish content and the blending of the "K" sites with the others that have more standard titles makes the network feel that it has two main components that have been brought together. Using the guest tour and TBP's listing of the network sites to get a good overview of what they have to offer is probably worth your time since this stuff might be very appealing to some and not at all interesting for others.
|
