|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
5.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
1.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
48.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
4.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 04-24-06 |
|
1. Picture quality is decent.
2. Good-sized site.
1. Non-exclusive, over-used content.
2. Video quality could be better.
3. Not updated very often.
4. A few navigational issues.
"Overall, there were just too many small things holding this site back." |
|
|
Unfortunately I'm not the best reference for pornstars as I never really got into the scene. However, hitting up the tour for Known Pornstars, I do recognize a few names and faces here of course (Anna Nova, Aria Giovanni, Briana Banks, etc.). Judging from what I see so far, I think this is going to be a collection of non-exclusive pornstar content that'll cost you $30 a month to see. It's also part of a network giving you access to 22 other sites form what I can tell.
The goods:
- There seems to be a lot of content available. Checking out the model's index, each letter has at least 10 names in it usually (except for those obscure ones), with many topping out at 30 models for a single letter or so by my unofficial glance over the list. The video section isn't quite as big unfortunately.
- Picture quality is decent. This stuff seems to come from places like Matrix Content, so the pictures look pretty good at least. It may have been seen before a few times, but at least the lighting and quality setups are nice.
The bads:
- Not updated too often. The latest updates are about 1.5 months ago for the photos and 2.5 months ago for the videos unfortunately. At least there's a good amount to see already, but the lack of updates sure hurts when they're charging more to begin with.
- Video quality could be better. They're just older videos it seems and not nearly up to today's standards in terms of quality. I'd look for 640x480 and 1000kbps for the WMV videos as a minimum, which they aren't really close to right now.
- No way to browse chronologically that I can find. You can browse by photos or videos only, and browse by models, but for the life of me I can't figure out a way to browse their content in the order it was released. It's just always mixed up in terms of dates for some reason.
- Non-exclusive, over-used content. I don't know pornstars much, but I definitely recognized a lot of this content as coming from Matrix Content or similar content stores. They didn't shoot it themselves, and it's likely you've seen it quite a few places before unfortunately.
Conclusion:
So, it's a semi-large collection (unless you want videos), but it's mostly stuff you've seen before. On top of that, the site itself is okay, but I've seen better for sure. When you're stuck with the content they offer here, I always look for something else to set them apart and I just never found that here. There are too many small problems holding them back to get a real recommendation from me.
|
