Kirsten's Room PAY SITE

KirstensRoom.com presents barely 18 year old Kirsten and more of Canada's youngest looking legal girls.


Category:  Individual Models  Secondary:  Amateur Girls, Young Adults

Launched:  Jan 2003 (approx.)   Pop-Ups: None

Visit Kirsten's Room

site facts
Content and cost details about kirstens-room.com. First Listed: 08-12-04 Facts Update: 04-30-08

Cost:
Trial:$11.90 (3 days, recurs $31.90/mo.)
Monthly:$31.90 (recurring)
Multi-Mo:$51.90 (2 months, recurring)
Pictures: 304+ Galleries (avg. 35 pics each)

Hi-Res Pics: Y, Model Index: N, Small & Large Pics: Y, ZIP Files: N

Watermarks: Yes, small-sized (all pictures).
Videos: 55+ Video Shoots (min. per video varies)

Full Scenes: N, Multi-Bandwidth: Y, Vid Caps: N

Watermarks: No Watermarks!
Updates: Dated Content, No Update Log.

Details: updates twice weekly.
Vid Format:
Quicktime (.mov)
1200k, 640x480
Downloadable		MPEG (.mpg)
bit unknown, 320x240
Downloadable		Windows (.wmv)
300k, 320x240
Downloadable

DRM: Video downloads have No DRM (no license restrictions).
Exclusive: All content is exclusive (exclusive amateur content).
DL Limit: No information found in the terms and conditions.
Other: Many galleries are vidcap galleries, 3 streaming cams and chat.
Independent Billing:
1. Verotel

Credit Card, 900 Number, Online Check, Postal Mail

Company Info:
VPWD
1 Site Listed
Partner:  Kirsten's Room Partners

To understand all the info above, checkout our Site Facts Glossary.
Duke's review
Duke's complete review and scoring breakdown of Kirsten's Room.

OFFICIAL
73.7
not bad

Content
Quality : 15.0 / 20 
Quantity : 10.5 / 15 
Entertain : 12.0 / 15 
Updates : 6.0 / 10 
Exclusive : 5.0 / 05 
Download : 2.0 / 05 
sub-total : 50.5 / 70 

Navigation
Easy : 8.0 / 10 
Features : 2.5 / 05 
Design : 3.5 / 05 
sub-total : 14.0 / 20 

Other
Temp Fill : 7.2 / 10 
sub-total : 7.2 / 10 

Curve : 2.0 (+/-5) 

Scoring Criteria  New

New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. 		Kirsten's Room Review by Duke
Editor: Duke Initial Review: 06-27-06

PROS:

1. Webcam focused content.

2. Very nice picture quality.
CONS:

1. Average quality videos.

2. Sporadic diary additions.
 BOTTOM LINE:

"Kirsten's amateur site revolves around her webcam content."
Kirsten is another Canadian amateur. Most amateurs up there seem to be based around the Montreal area but this chick isn't part of that crowd. The deal here is she lives with her boyfriend in a house wired with numerous 24/7 webcams and the site also has the standard amateur pictures and videos as well.

The Goods:

- Webcam Focused Content. The main thrust of the sites content comes in the form of the half dozen live cams that are always on along with member cam shows with chat. Even her videos section is mostly populated with archived cam appearances. Not many amateurs do the 24/7 cams thing so it's uniqueness is strength.

- Very Nice Picture Quality. It's rare for a solo amateur to have hi-res photos so in this area Kirsten's collection of pics stands out. Just about all the shoots are solo softcore with her in and out of a variety of outfits. Every so often I did run into a gallery with small lower quality stills from cam shows but the majority of the galleries have sharp and large pics.

The Bads:

- Average Quality Videos. The drop off between the picture and video quality is pretty dramatic. Perhaps it's because she relies on cam show archives for a videos collection but whatever the reason improving the video quality is something I'd like to see her work on. Also, the formatting needs to get more consistent, there are WMV, MPEG, and even some QT (uhg!).

- Sporadic Diary Entries. In the 4-5 months preceding my review there are only a few diary entries. Granted she does do interaction with the cams but if you're gonna make a diary a part of the site then it needs to be kept up to date.

Conclusion:

Kirsten does focus more on webcams than many other amateurs yet as far as site size and feel it's still a fairly normal amateur site. While there are some benefits that I pointed out I'm not sure whether they justify the rather high monthly price tag. She's definitely on the high end of what amateurs usually charge.


Enter Kirsten's Room

other editor reviews
Click below to read one of our other editor reviews for this site.

Kirsten's Room Review by Maggie Maggie 75.3 of 100  REVIEW

"Worth a look for fans of amateur cam sites, but it could be even better."
Kirsten's Room Review by Spencer Spencer 75.0 of 100  REVIEW

"For the high price, I just need a boost in content counts, updates, etc."
Kirsten's Room Review by Vanessa Vanessa 72.8 of 100  REVIEW

"I hope Kirsten is on cam a lot because that's the only draw to her site, I think."

Back to: Kirsten's Room Profile  |  The Best Porn Home