OFFICIAL
69.4
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
50.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
6.9 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
6.9 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Unique content.
2. Decent price.
1. Way too hard to get around.
2. Quality is lacking in a lot of sets.
3. Can't figure out update schedule.
"Go for the glory if that's what you're into, otherwise, I'd say pass." |
|
|
Man, where the hell do all these skanks hang out? Glory Hole City provides a glimpse into some chicks suckin supposed random guys off through holes in the bathroom wall. Whenever I go to the bathroom, all I'm greeted with are the sounds the fat guy next door is making trying to get every last ounce of crap out of his ass. These guys get to bang chicks!
Logging into the site (and even when browsing the tour), it's pretty confusing to get around. First off, the member's menu is in javascript, which makes the menus take a little while to load. Then you have to decide exactly which link to click you think might take you to the content. The first four menu choices all seem valid, I'm not quite sure initially what the differences are between them all.
I checked out the GHC Glory Gals, since I figured that's where they keep the best stuff. From there, there's a few ways to browse, but you'll basically pick a model from the list for the most part. Then you'll get a list of all that model's galleries available. A lot of the girls I recognized from other sites. That makes me think that maybe they don't actually shoot some of their stuff, rather they rely on submissions. I'm not 100% sure on that though. Their top section does say exclusive, which is a good sign. Checking out some of the galleries, some of them aren't even glory hole related which seems a little weird.
Picture quality ranges a ton. Unfortunately the very nature of the content leads to lots of dark rooms, which doesn't make for good picture taking. I saw a wide range of picture quality, from 640x480 crappy amateur pics (maybe they were screen caps for all I know), to large 1024x768 decent looking pictures.
Another thing I noticed while browsing the galleries was that the server seemed a little slow at times. Plus, every time I'd view a large photo, when I clicked back the whole page had to reload (meaning each and every thumbnail), which didn't seem normal to me. Maybe it's my computer, but the slow server wasn't helping!
The videos section is just as haphazard as the photos section, in all senses. First, it's tough to get around again (or rather, it's tough to know where to go exactly). Then, once you've found some clips you wanna watch, there's a few different video types in there. I saw some MPG, WMV, AVI, and others. The videos seemed to suffer more from the lack of light than even the photos did. Overall, the video quality was just ok, even though some of the numbers would suggest otherwise.
There's a LOT of extras. They have a whole community thing to check out, including message boards, submitted photos, etc. I can't really tell how often they update. The site says some new stuff was added a couple days ago, but the updates page is only updated like once a month with words, not photoset links.
The biggest problem here is just finding what's out there. The navigation is difficult at best, and the site could definitely use some upgrades to the organization. Still, for glory hole content I'm sure it's tough to beat. The content quality ranges a lot, but the pictures are generally decent to look at. The videos could use more light, but I don't think they can control that too much. $20 isn't too bad of a price, but I'd keep checking how often they update to make sure you're getting your money's worth. It's a good site for fans of the genre, but I wouldn't recommend it otherwise.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 02-07-06 |
Unfortunately it looks like a lot of my "cons" remain true this time around. I still think the site is a bit too difficult to get around, and I still can't really figure out any kind of update schedule. Their main exclusive girls section doesn't seem to have grown a ton since the last time we were here, and that's never good news. I think there is more stuff around, just not in that section. Then you finally get to some content and it almost looks like a feed site or something, very strange. Overall, I'd just like a much cleaner navigation here since it's not doing it for me right now.
Score increased from 68.3 to 69.4.
|
