|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
14.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
1.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
57.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Lots of updates (though only once a week).
2. Lots of hardcore in the videos section.
3. Lots of large galleries.
1. Content style isn't for everyone (Matrix, etc.).
2. Video quality could be improved slightly.
"I was pleasantly surprised here, with a lot of nice-looking content and extras." |
|
|
I had seen this site a long time ago and wanted to check it out. Thankfully I got the chance to do an express review on it, and it did well enough that we're doing a full review now (even though you'll never get to see my awesome express review work because of it). It's called Glamour Models Gone Bad, and I used to see their stuff on TGP galleries all the time. From what I remember, they have some decent content with a pretty familiar style and good quality pictures.
Buying a membership at $25 will get you access to Amateurs Gone Bad as well. They have a few little pods of 2-3 networked sites out there that don't seem to interconnect ever. Once you're inside and choose which of the two sites you want to see, you're on your way.
The site has a "pretty" look to it with pastel blues, pinks, and white, though the design looks a little dated to me (mostly the title logo). They get right to the good stuff with lists of their updates, models, galleries, videos, and more right on the main page. Although there are several long lists, a lot of them point to the same place it seems. It's big, but not that big :)
Each gallery link actually has like seven photo sets and eight video sets or so, and I think a new "gallery" comes once a week. So even though there aren't daily updates, there's enough coming out weekly to accomplish the same thing. The pictures are usually of pretty hot girls, in hot settings, with a familiar softcore style. They throw in some hardcore and lesbian scenes here and there as well. The size varies a bit, but sticks around 1024x768 for the most part, which isn't too bad. The one thing that bugs me is that there are only three thumbnails in a row, which makes for very long pages to scroll through when their galleries are on the large side. They also have zip files if you want them straight onto your computer.
Movies can be found on the galleries page, or there are separate movie-gallery-only pages as well if you prefer. The recent ones are in Windows Media format only, both in small clips and full-scene options. Older ones add a Quicktime option as well. Quality is decent here as well, even though the specs only show 320x240 and 430kbps. Even full-screen mode looks okay if you can believe it! There's a lot more hardcore stuff here, which is just fine by me.
Overall, it's a really nice site here I think. They have a lot of content, both pictures and videos, that is all pretty good quality. It's not too expensive, and you get access to another very similar site as well. Updates are large and come right on time every time. I'm sure I could find some really small problems here or there if I looked hard, but there's not a lot more I'd ask for here really. Nice stuff, just make sure you'll enjoy the content :)
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 08-28-06 |
Things are growing here, all around (my weiner for one). Actually, Glamour Models Gone Bad has grown quite a bit adding a lot of content since we were last here. A new search engine helps you wade through all their material which is a nice new features. Video specs are also larger with better-looking videos, which was one of my cons from last time around. Overall the new additions are nice to see, and the cons of the site remain the same with the non-exclusive content aspect. What they do, they do pretty well though so I can't fault them too much.
Score increased from 81.4 to 81.5.
|
