OFFICIAL
75.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
1.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
11.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Temp Fill : |
7.5 / 10 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 01-11-05 |
|
1. Nice niches available.
2. Videos look pretty good.
3. Good amount of content.
1. Site is so damn slow to get around.
2. Navigation could be improved.
"They've got decent content, but the bad site and slow servers ruined everything for me." |
|
|
Here's another network of sites, which is a good thing, and they happen to actually not be in the reality genre of porn. Imagine that! Instead, their sites feature niches such as mature, pee, bondage, and more. Checking out the tour, you don't get too excited because the site is so plain. It may be better to check out the tours of the actual sites so you can get an idea of what to expect here. We call the site the Get Right Network, because they don't really give their network a title so we used the company name.
I've tried to get around their sites for a good while now, and the navigation is just awful. There's no central member's area login for the whole network, so your best bet may be to go straight to the site you want to see. Some of the sites do provide links to the other member's areas, but not all of them (and some only provide links to the sites within the niche). Add this to a $30 price tag, which is a bit high, and I'm not really liking what I see right off the bat.
Once you actually get to the site you want to check out, they usually have a text menu to get around. The pictures link takes you to the photo galleries, which is where I started out. They don't give you much info on the galleries (just the model's name), but they do let you rate them which doesn't appear to be a very popular feature. Photos have an Eastern European feel to them from the get go; I'm not sure what it is, but the photos out of that part of the world have quite a distinct feeling to them. They are decent-sized at 1024x768, and galleries had a good amount of pictures. The one problem here is the slow servers, which made loading a page of thumbnails (and even just a 100k image) take much longer than I'm used to.
Some sites have videos while others don't; you'll just have to head to the sites you're interested in to find out I guess. They are divided up into clips, and come in one format only (which could be Windows Media, MPG, or others). Here, the slow server speed was a huge problem waiting for the videos to buffer. Downloading a three-minute clip was going to take 15 minutes, which is just too slow. General speeds were under that of a modem (and we're on a high-speed DSL link) at 10KB/sec. or so which is the worst I've ever seen. Quality is good once they finally get there at 320x240 and 1400kbps for the few clips I was able to look at, but man that wait is just too painful.
The content here is decent. They have some good niche stuff, and the quality is good (especially on the videos). Unfortunately the sites themselves need a major redesign and a huge server/connection upgrade. Getting around the sites is painful all around (even if it was faster), and that's what drags this network down the most. I don't think I could bring myself to pay $30 a month for this right now. Hopefully they can get through some of these issues.
|
