|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
54.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 06-12-07 |
|
1. All exclusive content.
2. Updates come pretty regularly.
3. Picture quality can be decent.
1. Video quality needs work.
2. Interaction isn't interacting much.
3. Navigation is a little confusing.
4. A little more expensive than expected.
"An okay amateur site that could use a little work, but had all the goodies." |
|
|
I'm not going to lie. I like girls from Georgia, and I like peaches (millions of peaches, peaches for free). Georgia's Peach sure has an in with me then you'd assume. She runs an amateur site here featuring content of her blonde hair and tanned body doing all sorts of fun things. I can't really find any information on her anywhere on the site, so I can't tell if she's modeled before or what (though some of the shoots look a little more pro than amateur). $25 gets you in the door, and that'll drop down to $20 a month after it rebills.
The goods:
- All exclusive content. Ahh yes, the hallmark of every solo girl site I suppose. Everything you see here should be exclusive to the site.
- Updates come pretty regularly. Photos are updated weekly or more, and videos are updated about weekly as well. I'm glad she keeps the content portion of her site updating pretty regularly.
- Picture quality can be decent lately. They seem to have added some lighting to the mix which has helped the pictures look a bit better. They're not 100% perfect yet, but are much better than most amateur sites.
The bads:
- Video quality needs work. I'm not sure why they're encoded so low, but an upgrade is desperately needed here. The quality is like that we saw several years ago on amateur sites, and nothing close to what we usually see today.
- Interaction isn't interacting much. Her diary entries stopped about a month ago, and her cam schedule is stuck in last month as well. The interaction on a solo site is pretty important, so I'd love to see this revived and kept on a regular schedule.
- Navigation is a little confusing. She breaks her content into a few different sections, and each of those has a few page numbers you have to choose from. I just wasn't quite sure what to click at first.
- A little more expensive than expected. The $25 initial price tag is just a little higher than normal, especially for a site that's lacking the interactive features currently. If she was doing perfect an all fronts, I wouldn't mind it as much.
Conclusion:
It's not a bad site, but it's not great either. I know these solo girls must get burned out at times, but while the site's up and running, it's good to be as consistent as possible with updates and interaction. For now, the content is growing, but she doesn't seem to have the time for the extras currently. The video quality is also a big negative. What's here now is fine, but I'd love to see more going on.
|
