|
Content
|
| Quality : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
7.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
51.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Duke |
Initial Review: 06-11-07 |
|
1. Solo, girl/girl, & hardcore content.
2. Vid shoots outnumber pic galleries.
1. Low video quality, no options.
2. Some webcam/journal gaps.
"An individual girl site with a typical mix of photo, video, & webcam content." |
|
|
Georgia Peach is a solo girl site with picture, video, webcam, and journal content which the kind of collection I expect to see from such a site. It seems she's more of a pornstar than an amateur since the guest tour and member's area doesn't really delve into her personal details. Instead it stays focused on how much she likes sex and other erotic details.
The Goods:
- Amateur with Solo, Girl/Girl, & Hardcore. In both the picture and video section Georgia's collection has her in solo, girl/girl, and some boy/girl performances. The girl/girl stuff goes beyond just one-on-one with some group action there too. She seems to enjoy performing for the camera and refers to herself as a "crazy girl".
- Video Shoots Outnumber Pic Galleries. While the videos aren't very long, there are more of them than the picture galleries. This is a pretty rare thing for individual girl sites so it's worth noting.
The Bads:
- Low Video Quality, No Options. The number of videos is the strength of that part of the site while the quality is a negative. Bumping this up would really make the content more enjoyable. The movies (and galleries for that matter) don't have dates of file size posted either. Only one quality level WMV format is offered.
- Some Webcam/Journal Entry Gaps. These are the interaction features of the site. This is based on what's happening at the time of this review (June '07). The webcam schedule is for the previous month of May and the journal has no entries for nearly a month. The journal also shows a large gap of over half-a-year in past posts.
Conclusion:
What Georgia is offering in terms of her content is fairly standard for an individual girl site. The numbers of photo galleries and videos are respectable but the quality is lacking. When we get back to take another look at the site it'll be interesting to see where the webcam and journal interaction features are at in terms of consistency.
|
