OFFICIAL
75.5
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
4.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
54.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
|
1. Nice exclusive price for us!
2. All exclusive content.
3. Access to lots of other sites.
1. No full-scene video options.
2. Needs some growth.
3. Not updating much.
4. Quality got a little worse somehow.
"I like what they have here, but just need to see more of it (and regular updates)!" |
|
|
I wonder what the difference is between a Gag Slut, and say a Gag Skank? Skanks seem a little dirtier to me, so I'm glad we're dealing with the sluts on this one. I'm assuming that Gag Sluts features content of chicks giving dudes blowjobs, otherwise it's a pretty bad name for a site if you ask me. It's part of a larger network we've never taken a look at called Paid Members Only. That gets you access to eight other sites with your $15 a month membership (which is an exclusive bargain only for our readers!).
To log in, they have you go to the actual network page first, but their site opens up right away. The site is pretty plain-looking, with a peach-colored background and black text making up most of the site. They seem to have updates coming once a week, but the site has only been open since November, 2004, so it's a bit on the small side from the looks of it (only 23 episodes up right now). Beyond that, the setup is pretty simple with your only decision is deciding which chick looks the best.
Most episodes have picture galleries to go along with them, and they are pretty standard. Sizes come back a little below 800x600, which ends up being a little small, and typical amateur-ish reality-style content. I am only so-so on the use of Image Folio, especially if it's not customized. Getting around the gallery can be a bit of a pain if you have the same tastes as I do.
Videos come in either an MPG clip, or there are two Windows Media Video quality choices as well. The one thing missing is a full-video file unfortunately. The Windows Media clips, which aren't the best of the quality options supposedly, look really nice here! I saw 512x384 and 1530kbps videos which looked better than the video on most sites. The MPG clips were a little larger in file size obviously, and came in at about the same specs on my end. I guess it comes down to personal preference on this one. They definitely all looked decent to me, and offered some good hardcore oral action.
There's really nothing in the way of extras, except for the bonus sites of course. The network also gets you access to another network of sites not included in their own list, which is interesting.
The biggest problem here is just the size of the site. I like the quality I see, and the content is good enough fun. However, with only 20-something galleries, it's a bit of an expensive time here. Down the road a bit, when things have grown more, I think I'll like it more. Full-scene videos would rock too! Thankfully they've lowered their price for us down to that $15 bargain, which really helps make it a little more worth it in the end.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 02-10-06 |
Well, my big complaint hasn't quite been taken care of yet unfortunately. I assumed we'd have some solid growth by now, but it's only up like eight episodes in 3/4 of a year. They did give us the awesome discount of $15 a month which helps, but that doesn't mean you can slack off on updates. There was a big pause for a while, but they've recently started back up again; only time will tell if they're reall back on track or not. Otherwise, more bonus content is available, but in the end I think they need to keep their own stuff in order most. I still like the content, but need more of it!!
Score increased from 77.2 to 78.3.
| 2nd Follow-Up Review |
Review: 01-19-07 |
Well, they're not (back on track that is). Updates have all but stopped it seems, or at least way slowed down. Quality has somehow actually gone downhill, with the videos listed at the top coming in at 400x300 and 1000kbps for some reason. I'm just not all that impressed here this time around with not many positive changes, and actually some new negatives changes to deal with. We still need growth, regular updates, and now we need the quality to bump back up again as well.
Score decreased from 78.3 to 75.5.
|
