|
Content
|
| Quality : |
16.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
10.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
5.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
|
1. Network access.
2. Full-length downloads.
1. Updates are infrequent.
2. No model index or content information.
3. Not enough user or download options.
"Unique content on a lack-luster site with no personality and average quality." |
|
|
FemalesOnShemales.com has somehow managed to find at least 15+ chicks who love shemale dick, and continues to "scour the world" to bring you new ones every 5 days or so. At least they used to, nothing new has been added since the end of last month, unfortunately. However, as a part of the Magnus Network, your $28.32 monthly membership also gives access to another 5+ sites ranging from anal play to creampie, amateur and more. There's plenty of room for improvement inside the member's area, but exclusive and unique content just might keep you wanting more, so hopefully they'll be delivering more soon?
The Good:
- Exclusive content and additional Network access is probably one of the biggest draws to this site thus far. It's not very common to find exclusive shemale content sites, let alone one that focuses on females with shemales.
The Somewhat Good:
- At one point new content was being added about every 5 days or so. Considering this is still a somewhat small collection, it's necessary that they pick up where they left off and get to updating again.
- Video and image quality looks pretty good overall, but could definitely stand to be even better. Videos don't stream very high, but they look better than you would think. And the images do look good, but the sizing of them is overall too small.
The Bad:
- There is no model or scene information offered. This really takes away from the uniqueness of the content and in some ways, lends itself to being just any old content site.
- Videos only stream as high as 768k and are broken down into too many smaller segments without the option for a full-length download. Likewise, there are no download options for the images.
- Site design in general could be improved by adding a model index (with bio information) and content descriptions.
The Conclusion:
So this is a first, the first time I've ever created a "somewhat good" category during a review. I always thought the first time I added a category it would be something like "the even worse", but all in all it's hard to bag on a site that offers unique content and Network access. With that said, Females on Shemales rightly deserves to be bashed on for their lack of recent updates, lack of model and content information, and no full-length downloads. Quality could also be improved and is overall below the standards for Internet paysites these days, especially for one that is so small and costs almost $30 bucks per month. Some real changes need to happen here before I could suggest a look inside this member's area.
| 1st Follow-Up Review |
Review: 03-15-09 |
Yikes! It would appear as though I didn't like this site very much after our initial visit close to a year and a half ago. Lack of recent updates, the ability to download videos, and a user-friendly site design were disappointing to say the least. A few upgrades have been made since then though. Videos can now be downloaded and streaming bitrates have doubled to almost 1400k. These changes are nice to see, but I'm not sure they are enough to make me change my mind about the site overall. Also because even though updates have been added, they're so infrequent it's still a shame. For me, the price of admission is too high for what you get. Maybe next time they'll make even larger steps towards being a quality Network site I feel comfortable suggesting to potential members.
Score increased from 70.0 to 71.0.
|
