OFFICIAL
67.0
worth a look |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
9.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
4.5 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
50.5 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.0 / 05 |
| Design : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
12.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
2.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
4.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Vanessa |
Initial Review: 04-26-08 |
|
1. Content quality looks good.
2. Some variety of softcore content.
1. Expensive for what it offers/small site.
2. No content descriptions or information.
3. No date stamps/clear update schedule.
4. Plain site/no personality, browse or viewing options.
"A plain site that doesn't really offer anything worth the price they're charging." |
|
|
FC (first class) Nudes is a softcore photography site offering exquisite looking European & American models in sexy poses and brightly contrasted backgrounds. Many of these models have previously graced the pages of magazines like Penthouse, Playboy, Swank and Hustler. While most of the content here is very softcore, you will also find some toy play, insertions and even girl-girl. $29.90 per month gets you access to 35+ models and 42+ more than are labeled as coming "soon". Each month they feature a new model, but without a clear update schedule there is no way to tell how often new image sets & videos are being offered.
The Good:
- Beautiful photography and exclusive content of stunning models: erotic stars, glamourmodels. At first look I thought this was going to be a simple softcore glamour & photography site, so I was pleased to find that there are also some very nice girl-girl, toy play and masturbation scenes.
- Content quality looks nice. Even though the pics are not considered "hi-res" in terms of pixel size, images are well-shot, sharp and brightly colored. Videos stream as high as 1500k in 720x576 video sizes.
The Bad:
- The overall look and feel of the site is very generic, as is the content. These girls are mostly well-known models and are simply listed with a preview image, no other content descriptions or set-ups are given.
- No clear update schedule. Basically you have no idea what's being added to the site and how often. For almost $30 bucks per month, I'd be expecting something to clue in on how often new content can be expected.
- Image size is average. For such nicely shot content, I would have preferred full-screen quality images.
- Plain site design with no browse features or viewing or download options. The model listing has no rhyme or reason to how the models are listed. In fact, they list current models' content and coming soon content all mixed together. I'm not sure if this is supposed to be some sort of trick into making users think there is more content then there actually is or what? Suffice to say there really are only 35+ models with content and another 42+ listed without any content. See what I mean?
The Conclusion:
I didn't like this site at all! I don't get it. Why list 77+ models when less than half of them have actual content? Lack of content information really lends to the generic feel of the site, and lack of large image sizes, viewing, browsing & download options doesn't help either. The $29.90/month price tag only adds insult to injury and only makes me want to warn potential buyers to stay away. Maybe I'm missing something but I don't really get this site, what they're really offering to members and why the expensive price tag?
|
