OFFICIAL
76.0
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
13.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
55.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Maggie |
Initial Review: 04-23-08 |
|
1. Exclusive content.
2. High quality content.
3. Clean design.
1. Content not as sharp as expected.
2. No update dates.
3. Small collection.
4. Could use more browse features.
"An overall quality original collection for fans of glamour babes." |
|
|
FC Nudes stands for First Class Nudes, and offers up high quality content of beautiful glamorous models. The tour looks sharp and the models are clearly professional. At first I thought this would be an artistic nude site but the action is more glam than artsy and don’t let the term “nude” lead you into believing this is all softcore. Crissy and her blue vibrator can attest that things get a little naughtier than that inside.
The Goods –
All of the content here is exclusive. All these gorgeous glamour babes are shot just for FC Nudes. I love finding new content of long-time favorite models so it’s really impressive that they original material of popular babes like Silvia Saint, Sophie Sweet, and Crissy Moran.
The pictures and videos look good. Everything is sharp and very professional-looking. The photos are bright and colorful. The locations and outfits are thoughtfully put together for all-around attractive scenes.
The site design is clean and nice looking. There are some professional graphics but overall it’s fairly simple. It’s pretty nice.
The Bads –
The content doesn’t look nearly as good as the tour would have you believe. Don’t get me wrong, it does look really, really nice, but the tour claims are a bit overblown. They write that they’re “Your #1 For The Highest Quality Available On The Net”. They also promise “The Biggest HQ Archive” and “HD Videos.” Well, with just 30-something videos they’re not the biggest, and with videos that play at 1400k and a size of 720x576, they’re not HD.
There’s no update information. Nothing is dated and there’s no update log either, just a list of “Our Latest Updates”. There’s also a “Model of the Month” but I assume that’s just a featured girl and that updates come more often than that. Maybe not, though.
The site is still pretty small. Right now there are just 35 models (with 1-5 galleries a piece) and just 30 videos. That makes the lack of update info even more troublesome.
There aren’t enough browse features. The only method of browsing the content is via their model list. They give you no tools to sort the girls (like by age, hair color, recently added, etc), they just show them alphabetically. There are no categories and they don’t even have a separate video section. It’s actually pretty disorganized.
Conclusion –
Overall, I enjoyed the good quality original content on FC Nudes. I’m a fan of the genre so I really liked the beautiful models and the attractive scenes. Unfortunately, the site comes up short in a few areas. The missing update info and small collection also make it tough to pay their price of $30 a month. I really want to recommend FC Nudes, but more than that, I’d like to see a few changes made first.
|
