|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.0 / 15 |
| Updates : |
5.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
52.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.0 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria
|
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 01-18-07 |
|
1. All exclusive handjob content.
2. Not a terribly small site.
1. Quality needs work.
2. Not sure when they update.
3. Not many extras.
"Fantasy Handjobs is a pretty average site overall, it was fine but not sponge-worthy." |
|
|
Well I don't see much Fantasy at Fantasy Handjobs, I do see a lot of handjobs going on right in their tour even. It looks like they offer exclusive content, don't date their updates, and charge $25 a month for access to the site. Nothing really stands out in the tour here; it looks like most every other paysite tour to me. We'll see what they have to offer inside and how worth it it is.
The goods:
- All exclusive handjob content. I guess that's why you came here, right? All their scenes are handjob scenes, and they are all exclusive like they claim (they even remind you under every scene that it's exclusive - it's really important to them).
- Not a terribly small site. With 60 video scenes up, you're doing fine here in terms of stuff to watch. I'm not sure how often new content is added but I hope it'll grow, but at least for today there'll be enough to keep you busy for a little bit.
The bads:
- Quality needs work. The newer stuff is at 400x300 and 1000kbps, but most of the content is at their old 320x240 and 450kbps. Both quality options are actually kinda bad to me, the older stuff being the worst of course. There's just too much in the way of enjoying the video for me.
- Not sure when they update. Their tour lists an update date of "recently" by all their newest scenes, so that doesn't help us much. I didn't get a chance to see our old content count either to know how fast it grew.
- Not many extras. The site is very plain, almost cookie-cutter with the other sites in their network I'm guessing. There's just one video type, and you can't even watch the full scene in one file. Overall the site is just very simple and to the point.
Conclusion:
A short review for a plain site, it seems fitting to me. The scenes here are fine, but need better quality for sure. I'm not sure when they update, but at least it's not tiny. The content is exclusive, but they don't take that very far with a lot of info or extras. It's just a very average site to me and would be fine for a quick look, but it didn't hook me much.
|
