|
Content
|
| Quality : |
15.5 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
11.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
6.5 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
53.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
8.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
14.5 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
3.5 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
6.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Maggie |
Initial Review: 03-26-07 |
|
1. Original content.
2. Most scenes look good.
3. Multi-site access.
1. No interaction with Kelly.
2. No update info.
3. Lots of upsells.
"One of the cuter corporate amateurs but the site could be better." |
|
|
I didn’t realize Barbie did porn! OK, so her name is Kelly and she’s only 18 years old, but she looks just like the buxom doll with the perfect body in her tour photos. She looks a little less doll-like inside, but she’s still one of the cutest young “amateur” models we’ve come across. I use the term “amateur” loosely because while she may not be a pornstar, this site feels pretty darn corporate.
The Goods –
I get the impression that the content here is original. I can’t be sure, but exclusive content is usually standard on sites like this. I can tell you that I didn’t recognize any of it; I didn’t recognize Kelly at all, actually. So, my guess is that it’s exclusive or if not, it’s not overexposed material.
Most of Kelly’s content looks nice. The pictures are usually well-lit and good sized at 1053x700. The videos vary a bit more. The tour advertises high definition videos. However, only two of the 60 videos have that option. The rest play at 300k. The two at at 2000k look nice and sharp, but the majority look more average. Overall, though, I can’t complain about the quality of these scenes.
Members get access to the Raw XXX Network of sites. 46 sites are included, with plenty of them dedicated to cute teens that Kelly’s fans are sure to enjoy. She even gives members access to the websites of seven “friends” with similar solo model set-ups. There’s a ton to see here beyond Kelly’s own content.
The Bads –
There’s no interaction with Kelly and I doubt she’s involved at all in this site. There’s no journal, no webcam, no message board, not even descriptions with the galleries and videos to give the illusion that she’s involved. There’s a lot of sexy content but no real personality.
I’m not sure how often updates come. The tour advertises weekly updates Inside are links suggesting that four updates took place one day last week, but those links don’t go to the actual galleries and they just read a very generic “See My New Pics” so I can’t be sure if this is actually true. No dates are provided on any of the scenes so there’s no way to tell when this site is being updated.
There are a ton of upsells here. There are banner ads to personal sites, webcam sites, online video stores, and other solo model websites everywhere. It’s really distracting and not something I want to see when I’m already paying $30 a month for membership.
Conclusion –
There’s no denying that Kelly is a hottie and that alone may be enough to justify joining. The scenes look good and the network access is a nice bonus. The rest of Kelly’s site, though, needs work. It’s clear she isn’t involved and I’m not sure how much action the site sees anyway. Dream Kelly is probably good for a month’s membership just to check it out, but after that I’m not sure I’d stick around.
|
