OFFICIAL
76.5
pretty good |
|
Content
|
| Quality : |
17.0 / 20 |
| Quantity : |
11.0 / 15 |
| Entertain : |
12.5 / 15 |
| Updates : |
8.0 / 10 |
| Exclusive : |
5.0 / 05 |
| Download : |
2.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
56.0 / 70 |
| Navigation |
| Easy : |
7.5 / 10 |
| Features : |
2.5 / 05 |
| Design : |
3.0 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
13.0 / 20 |
| Other |
| Originality : |
4.0 / 05 |
| Hard Facts : |
3.5 / 05 |
| sub-total : |
7.5 / 10 |
Scoring Criteria New
New Update!
As of Aug 15th, 07, price of a site is no longer factored into the overall score/rank. |
|
| Editor: Spencer |
Initial Review: 12-20-05 |
|
1. Updates come regularly.
2. Exclusive content.
3. Content looks nice.
1. Scenes can be a little cheesy.
2. Needs some growth.
3. Design and navigation could be better.
"A good start so the site here, and with time it could be even better." |
|
|
If I was a more standup guy, I might try to save some chicks in need. Instead, I'm pretty lazy and just keep on moving on whenever possible. Now we have a place to go check out chicks in need at Damsels in Peril (peril is a good word, I like it). Judging by the tour, this seems to mostly provide pictures of naked chicks all tied up, which is always fun to see. They bill in Euros at 25 Euros a month, which comes out to about $30 a month right now for us in the U.S.
The member's area is a little more simple-looking than the tour is, which is always disappointing, but it looks okay I guess. Up at the top is a menu getting you around the site which is pretty straightforward. Without much extra info to check out here, I'll just head on into the photos section to get looking at some naked chicks!
Besides having to scroll a lot (with only one gallery per line), their picture layout is pretty basic. They give a thumbnail preview, description, and links to the gallery and zip files right from the main page. I can also tell you they average an update once per week, though sometimes it'll be just a little bit slower than that. Judging by the thumbnails, everything seems to be exclusive here which is always a nice treat.
The gallery pages are very plain, with just a generic white template taken from the program that makes their galleries by my guess. The actual images are displayed on a black page, with thumb previews of the previous and next images available as well (though it sucks to have to scroll down to see get to the "next image" link). Pictures look quite nice here, and are a good size at 1024x768 from what I saw. Lighting and coloring are usually well done, and my only real complaint that popped up more than once was a slight blurriness to some photos (not sure what that's from except maybe just a bad focus).
The movies aren't dated on the main movies page, but on the updates page you can see they come once a week as well in between the photo updates. They come in only one option: a full-scene downloadable MPG. Their server speed came in about half of my usual downloading speed, but that could be a temporary problem. The videos come in at 352x288 and 2,000kbps which isn't bad at all for an MPG video. Quality is pretty good, about right on par for what you'd expect from their photos. The scenes can be a little cheesy to watch, but what do you expect when so much acting is necessary from the models :) The quality was quite nice, and that's what's most important.
For extras, they basically offer only a semi-active forum to browse and post in. It was more promising with some links to a model's page and some out takes, but the out takes page is empty since March, 2005, and the model's page just contains pics of their models without any links or extra info (which doesn't do a whole lot of good really).
There are a lot of little problems that add up here, but all in all it's a decent site. The navigation and design could be improved a bit, and I also wouldn't mind seeing some of the extras come back. On the flip side, they offer all exclusive content in pretty good quality that's updated quite regularly. Definitely worth a look for those of you interested in some tied-up damsels (in peril) I'd say.
|
